Not difficult to do when you only have a few launches in 20 yearsAnd yet none of NASA's rockets exploded
Not really. Constellation was cancelled in 2010 and the Artemis program wasn't announced until 2019 which was around the time SpaceX's launch tempo was really picking up and the company had some major successes. SpaceX's ascendancy and huge accomplishments were a kick in the pants to NASA, so the government trotted out Artemis.No it wasn't. Artemis was a revamped program using plans that were drawn up for the cancelled Constellation program during the Obama administration
only a paid troll would talk like thisMajor achievements of SpaceX include:
The last time a NASA rocket exploded was in 1986, and have had some 900 launches since then.Not difficult to do when you only have a few launches in 20 years
BTW, what happened to that rocket??The tallest, most powerful, and most massive rocket to ever launch (Starship first test flight, April 20, 2023)
NASA tends to use the same old and inefficient rocket technology over and over. They are not pioneering new technologies.The last time a NASA rocket exploded was in 1986, and have had some 900 launches since then.
SpaceX is on the cutting edge of heavy lift rocket tech. That is serious competition to NASA which doesn’t want to be embarrassed by a brash upstart.SpaceX launches commissioned by NASA haven't exploded because they were built to NASA's standards. Starship was built to Elon's standards, and are prone to explosion. As such, NASA appears to have dropped Starship from Artemis 3.
Unlike NASA, SpaceX is a risk taker that is pushing the entire rocket industry into the future with new technologies. Spacex is willing to do what others will not in order to create better rockets and much greater efficiencies.BTW, what happened to that rocket?
Being new is worthless if it's inconsistent.NASA tends to use the same old and inefficient rocket technology over and over. They are not pioneering new technologies.
SpaceX has barely put the Spaceship in LEO, I'm still waiting on SpaceX getting to the moon let alone Mars. I'll eat my words when that happens in the next 4 years.SpaceX is on the cutting edge of heavy lift rocket tech. That is serious competition to NASA which doesn’t want to be embarrassed by a brash upstart.
Lol bitch here thinks exploding rockets is "better rockets". But you're right: SpaceX rockets are more efficient... in blowing themselves upUnlike NASA, SpaceX is a risk taker that is pushing the entire rocket industry into the future with new technologies. Spacex is willing to do what others will not in order to create better rockets and much greater efficiencies.
Why does that flag have only 39 stars on itAs an American, if this doesn’t warm your heart and fill you with pride then you probably have no soul.
View attachment 55228
Only in the boosters. Liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen are the primary fuels for Artemis II.Besides the Artemis 2 uses solid rocket fuel
SpaceX SAVED nasa’s arse by rescuing their astronauts who were stranded in the space station for more than nine months because NASA tech simply didn’t work.SpaceX has barely put the Spaceship in LEO, I'm still waiting on SpaceX getting to the moon let alone Mars. I'll eat my words when that happens in the next 4 years.
SpaceX offers significantly lower launch costs compared to NASA, with Falcon 9 launches costing around $67 million, while NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) exceeds $2 billion per launch.Lol bitch here thinks exploding rockets is "better rockets". But you're right: SpaceX rockets are more efficient... in blowing themselves up
It’s flapping in the air generated by Elon’s powerful forward momentum.Why does that flag have only 39 stars on it
Chat is quence literally this retarded?SpaceX offers significantly lower launch costs compared to NASA, with Falcon 9 launches costing around $67 million, while NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) exceeds $2 billion per launch.
Don’t use chat. It’s unreliable.Chat is quence literally this retarded?
@Grok is quence literally this retardedDon’t use chat. It’s unreliable.
However, that is a good choice.@Grok
already done:@Grok is quence literally this retarded