The Attempted Ethnic Genocide of White South Africans

How can you say I'm agreeing with you when I mentioned the narrative in the US media first?

jewish media is spinning

he and people like him pay the media

**
How is it you not recognize controlled opposition?
And not see the nuanced reason why the US is now really getting involved.

to be honest, Musk could just launch Starlink over SA and chances are the SA would never know.

This is more than just some incident not meeting your measure and the benefit of one autistic billionaire.
 
Likeicare said:
Read your own post. Youre talking about trump supposedly ambushing the SA president. Its completely unrelated to the actual subject
Click to expand...
Read my post. I said the media. You do understand there's the jewish gung-ho zionist side and the "more acceptable" controlled opposition.

Again, I'm the one who mentioned the media's slant on the whole situation. You know we can agree to disagree.
 
this thread reminds me of something i found on x today
my-dad-watched-my-3yr-old-nephew-for-my-sister-today-v0-e9hygwa80e4f1.jpg
 
Likeicare said:
Nigga just admit you got fooled
Click to expand...
Ok perhaps you don't understand where I'm coming from, not surprising since the entire universe revolves around you.

To say there isn't targeted violence against whyte peeple in the US due to the high number of black on black murders is retarded. There is. Politicians enthusiastically call for it. People of authority call for it as well. They openly say they want to destroy whyte peeple. The only reason why it's not accepted as targeted violence is because the jews, blacks and muslims brought slavery to the US. It's genocide by definition, your very specific interpretation of genocide doesn't hold water. Now it may not be on a scale which there should be alarm, but what is the demarcation line which you will accept? and why is any targeted violence acceptable then. you fail to answer this simple question.
 
Likeicare said:
View attachment 35140

Just stop
Click to expand...
You prove my point.
Volentary segrigation keeps the white/nonblack living members alive and not murdered by blacks.

The dynamic is very complex and it's disingenuous (which you often are) to refer to a single statistic as your only support for your argument.

Again none of what you post negotiates what I posted. There is a narrative which is being pushed. However "incorrect" it may seem now, it's easy to see that SA needs only a tinderspark to explode. The US narrative of "white genocide" in SA is not racial in it's focus, but arms. Who will sell arms to the different factions of SA. The jews policy makers don't give a flying fuck about SA

Not to mention SA is one of the few nations leading the charge against israel and due to that stories of barbarity are often minimized or ignored. So there's that egg you can leave boiling.

Psy-ops are purposefully confusing. But once you look past the chaos and you see the US' main goal which is not oil, or materials, but arms sales, then the picture should be far clearer.

Or not. don't care. That's my take.

So again:
1. I openly acknowledged the media slant and counter-slant. First.
2. I openly acknowledged that Trump was leading one side of the narrative. First.
3.. Musk's desire for Starlink to operate in SA is really not an issue. Satellites are above airspace. So that point is completely and utterly false. He literally has the president as a personal friend and the full weight of the current administration and could if he wanted to launch SL over AS and no one would care or be the wiser.
4. SA is another nation (thanks to the jews) on the verge of collapse. Civil war is imminent.

Quite simply, the situation is unfolding but the predictions of mass white slaughter, not due to defensive operations are exceptionally high due to the increasing instability of the nation and the retards which have wrested the mantle of governance from the sane and able.

Do try to not answer with a tl;dr. Thanks in advance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom