Countzer0
Ediot
that explains the Bible....not (damn good book, but lived experiences? come on)Some of the best books are explorations of lived experiences, don’tcha know?
or most of the great myths
Homeros probably wasn't real but man the stories.
that explains the Bible....not (damn good book, but lived experiences? come on)Some of the best books are explorations of lived experiences, don’tcha know?
heraclius mentionedsounds too early yet, Heraclius has yet to make an appearance.
war in the balkans mentioned
After finishing your reading of a purchased book which is copyrighted past your expected natural demise, do you donate it to your local library?
Yeah, turns out that any power on the Iranian plateau is ridiculously difficult to invade and/or hold because of the various mountain ranges that effectively cut off armies and supply routes. It does make it all the more impressive that Alexander the Great did it as he took logistics incredibly seriously. Even then, he still took 5 years fucking off to the far eastern portions of the empire chasing usurpers and former Greek remnants that were exiled there from past wars. The Romans learned early and fast that they were out of there elements even getting through Mesopotamia as Crassus got obliterated and Mark Anthony got humiliated. One of the main reasons that Alexander was successful is that he basically left the people who didn't resist in power in their local areas and pissed off his own army by adopting their culture.end of chapter 8:
"Rome, however, was a western power based in the mediterranean world and she could not impose her hegemony over the entire middle east in the face of an effective Iranian power, the Parthians. Any power with it's base outside the middle east faces the same challenge. Each succeeding western power has to come to terms with the regime in Iran."
View attachment 63758
I don't have space in my apartment. I also don't see a reason to re-read a novel or to the extent rewatch a drama.FUCK NO THAT'S COMMUNISM
I saw you replied, and I thought holy fuck, this guy can read??magazines
I despise book clubs. People in them invariably choose some really awful books for everyone to read.I read a book for book club
yeh ima be honest, when it comes to the other continent's empires tho n who invaded what n where, all that stuff is not my forte. i've learned plenty abt rome n greece n all that, like grad school level essay writing on it n shit, n forgotten it. ask me how parrot feathers from south america ended up in utah tho n it's like activating a sleeper cellYeah, turns out that any power on the Iranian plateau is ridiculously difficult to invade and/or hold because of the various mountain ranges that effectively cut off armies and supply routes. It does make it all the more impressive that Alexander the Great did it as he took logistics incredibly seriously. Even then, he still took 5 years fucking off to the far eastern portions of the empire chasing usurpers and former Greek remnants that were exiled there from past wars. The Romans learned early and fast that they were out of there elements even getting through Mesopotamia as Crassus got obliterated and Mark Anthony got humiliated. One of the main reasons that Alexander was successful is that he basically left the people who didn't resist in power in their local areas and pissed off his own army by adopting their culture.

oh absolutely, and even as america suburban sprawled out west, the women who came with and settled voted on stuff. the men knew they were out there risking indian raids n driving cattle in the desert n risking dysentery on the wagon trains, etc. women losing the right to vote came with statehood, in such cases.starship troopers kiddo
View attachment 64012
though the idea came from ancient Greece. people will often go "it wasn't a real democracy like ours, women, slaves and foreigners couldn't vote", which is wrong. it's the non-combatants who couldn't vote.
also
View attachment 64013
View attachment 64014
yelps part had me![]()
In my experience this is true, but it's nice to be able to actually talk to a real person about a book for once, rather than rambling about it on hereI despise book clubs. People in them invariably choose some really awful books for everyone to read.
Yes, but if you’re jonesing for real human interaction there are better ways than being held hostage to the prattling of some doofus concerning a book that has far more intrinsic value as kindling for a campfire weenie roast.In my experience this is true, but it's nice to be able to actually talk to a real person about a book for once, rather than rambling about it on here