It’s real. It’s happening. It won’t be ignored.
The Attempted Ethnic Genocide of White South Africans
- Thread starter Quence
- Start date
No its not
Wrong.
Of course you'd believe in that shit
I only believe in facts.
8% of the population account for less than 2% of deaths
What are you going on about? The SA white population is 7.3% - only 4.5 million - of 62 million and dropping quickly.
Who the fuck equates a white person’s death with that of a low IQ bootlipped negro? They are not the same. Very little is lost when a negro dies. White South Africans are the only population keeping that country’s economy somewhat afloat. Yet they are being targeted specifically because they are white in a concerted effort to kill them and take their land/homes/businesses and the SA government is well implicated in these crimes.
Read this:
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/05/what_will_become_of_the_white_south_african.html
South Africa’s been in the news recently, perhaps as much these past two weeks as in 1994. That was the year they exorcised racial demons and embraced democracy. The end of Apartheid, the beginning of Multiracial Utopia.
A glorious moment, right?
Sorry, no.
I didn’t think so then, and I don’t think so now. I didn’t know much in 1994, but I had instincts, and every instinct I had flashed red. Those poor whites will be butchered and chased out. It’s obvious. Rhodesia was the cautionary tale.
The propaganda was so strong that I briefly indulged optimism. Maybe South Africa was different. A year into Mandela’s presidency, fate scripted a near miracle when the Springboks beat the formidable All Blacks in the World Cup of Rugby, a most improbable outcome.
When Nelson Mandela donned the hallowed green jersey to present the trophy to Afrikaner Francois Pienaar, ecstasy was in the air. A country previously banned from the pitch had reached the pinnacle. It was transcendent, a moment to unite a nation. It surely prophesied a bright future for the Rainbow Nation.
It was a wonderful victory to be sure, but that’s all it was. No matter the gravity, the place in time, the feelings evoked, it made no guarantee on the future. And in the end, Mandela was only human. Yes, the terrorist-turned-politician survived captivity. Yes, he showed grace and humility (when he held the winning cards). In the end, he was no better than any other any other two-bit African dictator.
I wasn’t the only one whose instincts flashed red in ‘94. Whites began flooding out of South Africa immediately, a migration that came to be known as the Chicken Run. What, you scared of being tortured and slaughtered?
Estimates vary, but about a million whites have gotten outta dodge. I know a few myself, and none has regrets, except for family members left behind. More would leave if they could, but the government and circumstances make it impossible for most.
Afrikaners are a different breed, mind you. Tough men, hardened by land and war. Obdurate. Determined. And by a covenant with God, they know that the land is theirs. They were the first to claim it — not counting the Bushmen — and they will fight to the death to keep it. They truly are a remarkable people.
But is determination enough in a country that’s undergone an appalling descent since the start of black rule? Each year, things get uglier for South African whites. Each year, the noose tightens. Some call Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) the world’s most extreme affirmative action program — a tool to keep whites unemployed and prevent them from starting businesses, plus a trough for black bureaucrats.
Calls from the black ruling class for violence and land seizure are well documented. The EFF’s Julius Malema chants “Shoot the Boer” to packed arenas, and blacks in attendance enter a frenzied state. Go figure — a major political party actively promoting genocide.
And it works. For those brave enough to look, the horrors abound. Unspeakable acts. Elderly victims bound and tortured for hours. Young girls raped and gutted. Parents forced to watch. Hateful anti-white messages written in blood. Grizzly stuff.
This is not crime, as they’d have you believe. It’s state-sanctioned terror. Racially motivated. If it’s not literal genocide, it’s precursor to genocide. Not only is it tolerated, but it’s celebrated.
This brings us to the arrival of 59 refugees into America. Did I mention they were white? That monumental precedent triggered a fault line in fundamental leftist doctrine, which is predicated on anti-white hatred. White Man Bad is their anchor principle.
They melted down. They went full mask-off and bared raw anti-white hatred for all to see. For 59 people, a negligible number. But to concede that white refugees exist is to concede...almost everything. Even certain Christian churches piously cited moral opposition to resettling Afrikaners. My God, the rot is so deep. The enemy is everywhere.
This brings us to Cyril Ramaphosa’s visit to the White House, ostensibly to discuss trade and investment — in other words, ask for money. Trump had other plans. He called out the African dictator on live television, as only Trump can. “Turn the lights down,” he said, as Ramaphosa giggled like a nervous schoolboy. It was glorious. Only Trump has the cojones to hold another world leader’s feet to the fire so magnificently.
In the process, white genocide was acknowledged. It was blasphemy to leftist media. The plight of white South Africans is not to be brought up in polite company. Certainly not in the press. Predictably, they went into overdrive, aggressively running cover — diverting, denying, obfuscating.
There is no genocide, we were told. Sorry, not enough atrocities. Not enough killing. They harped on semantics. They split hairs on terminology. Headlines repeated the catchphrases: Baseless Claims. Unproven Claims. False Claims.
The humiliated South African government were furious. But they’re in an awkward spot when it comes to whites. They obviously despise whites, but without them, they have no tax base. They have no country. They’ve shown time and again that without whites, infrastructure crumbles and food supply vanishes. Without whites, South Africa’s journey to third-world status, already well underway, becomes complete.
Thank God Trump has shone light on the sordid business of South Africa, but none of this is new. I covered it at length in my 2019 epic Never, Never and Never Again — the title borrowed from Mandela’s now-laughable statement, made during his inaugural address: “Never, never and never again shall it be that this beautiful land will again experience the oppression of one by another.”
Yes, my instincts in 1994 were right. Rhodesia all over again. Was there ever a doubt? There was never a Rainbow Nation. It was a fairy tale. Fluffy egalitarianism exists only in first-world bubbles. Race realism rules the day in prisons, jungles, and countries like South Africa.
What will become of the white South African? people ask with morbid curiosity. When the lights go out for good? When starvation, chaos, and violence run rampant? What then?
I see two paths: 1. A homeland within or 2. Get the hell out. Both are messy, but both have a toehold. With Option 1, the Orania template — an Afrikaner state — is thriving and growing. With Option 2, Trump has cracked the door open.
Either way, I pray for the whites of South Africa. I also pray that the strife they face is not our own destiny in the years to come.
A glorious moment, right?
Sorry, no.
I didn’t think so then, and I don’t think so now. I didn’t know much in 1994, but I had instincts, and every instinct I had flashed red. Those poor whites will be butchered and chased out. It’s obvious. Rhodesia was the cautionary tale.
The propaganda was so strong that I briefly indulged optimism. Maybe South Africa was different. A year into Mandela’s presidency, fate scripted a near miracle when the Springboks beat the formidable All Blacks in the World Cup of Rugby, a most improbable outcome.
When Nelson Mandela donned the hallowed green jersey to present the trophy to Afrikaner Francois Pienaar, ecstasy was in the air. A country previously banned from the pitch had reached the pinnacle. It was transcendent, a moment to unite a nation. It surely prophesied a bright future for the Rainbow Nation.
It was a wonderful victory to be sure, but that’s all it was. No matter the gravity, the place in time, the feelings evoked, it made no guarantee on the future. And in the end, Mandela was only human. Yes, the terrorist-turned-politician survived captivity. Yes, he showed grace and humility (when he held the winning cards). In the end, he was no better than any other any other two-bit African dictator.
I wasn’t the only one whose instincts flashed red in ‘94. Whites began flooding out of South Africa immediately, a migration that came to be known as the Chicken Run. What, you scared of being tortured and slaughtered?
Estimates vary, but about a million whites have gotten outta dodge. I know a few myself, and none has regrets, except for family members left behind. More would leave if they could, but the government and circumstances make it impossible for most.
Afrikaners are a different breed, mind you. Tough men, hardened by land and war. Obdurate. Determined. And by a covenant with God, they know that the land is theirs. They were the first to claim it — not counting the Bushmen — and they will fight to the death to keep it. They truly are a remarkable people.
But is determination enough in a country that’s undergone an appalling descent since the start of black rule? Each year, things get uglier for South African whites. Each year, the noose tightens. Some call Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) the world’s most extreme affirmative action program — a tool to keep whites unemployed and prevent them from starting businesses, plus a trough for black bureaucrats.
Calls from the black ruling class for violence and land seizure are well documented. The EFF’s Julius Malema chants “Shoot the Boer” to packed arenas, and blacks in attendance enter a frenzied state. Go figure — a major political party actively promoting genocide.
And it works. For those brave enough to look, the horrors abound. Unspeakable acts. Elderly victims bound and tortured for hours. Young girls raped and gutted. Parents forced to watch. Hateful anti-white messages written in blood. Grizzly stuff.
This is not crime, as they’d have you believe. It’s state-sanctioned terror. Racially motivated. If it’s not literal genocide, it’s precursor to genocide. Not only is it tolerated, but it’s celebrated.
This brings us to the arrival of 59 refugees into America. Did I mention they were white? That monumental precedent triggered a fault line in fundamental leftist doctrine, which is predicated on anti-white hatred. White Man Bad is their anchor principle.
They melted down. They went full mask-off and bared raw anti-white hatred for all to see. For 59 people, a negligible number. But to concede that white refugees exist is to concede...almost everything. Even certain Christian churches piously cited moral opposition to resettling Afrikaners. My God, the rot is so deep. The enemy is everywhere.
This brings us to Cyril Ramaphosa’s visit to the White House, ostensibly to discuss trade and investment — in other words, ask for money. Trump had other plans. He called out the African dictator on live television, as only Trump can. “Turn the lights down,” he said, as Ramaphosa giggled like a nervous schoolboy. It was glorious. Only Trump has the cojones to hold another world leader’s feet to the fire so magnificently.
In the process, white genocide was acknowledged. It was blasphemy to leftist media. The plight of white South Africans is not to be brought up in polite company. Certainly not in the press. Predictably, they went into overdrive, aggressively running cover — diverting, denying, obfuscating.
There is no genocide, we were told. Sorry, not enough atrocities. Not enough killing. They harped on semantics. They split hairs on terminology. Headlines repeated the catchphrases: Baseless Claims. Unproven Claims. False Claims.
The humiliated South African government were furious. But they’re in an awkward spot when it comes to whites. They obviously despise whites, but without them, they have no tax base. They have no country. They’ve shown time and again that without whites, infrastructure crumbles and food supply vanishes. Without whites, South Africa’s journey to third-world status, already well underway, becomes complete.
Thank God Trump has shone light on the sordid business of South Africa, but none of this is new. I covered it at length in my 2019 epic Never, Never and Never Again — the title borrowed from Mandela’s now-laughable statement, made during his inaugural address: “Never, never and never again shall it be that this beautiful land will again experience the oppression of one by another.”
Yes, my instincts in 1994 were right. Rhodesia all over again. Was there ever a doubt? There was never a Rainbow Nation. It was a fairy tale. Fluffy egalitarianism exists only in first-world bubbles. Race realism rules the day in prisons, jungles, and countries like South Africa.
What will become of the white South African? people ask with morbid curiosity. When the lights go out for good? When starvation, chaos, and violence run rampant? What then?
I see two paths: 1. A homeland within or 2. Get the hell out. Both are messy, but both have a toehold. With Option 1, the Orania template — an Afrikaner state — is thriving and growing. With Option 2, Trump has cracked the door open.
Either way, I pray for the whites of South Africa. I also pray that the strife they face is not our own destiny in the years to come.
29.1.2018
VP/HR — Continued violence against white South Africans
In South Africa, white farmers have for years been exposed to an unprecedented wave of violence. Statistically, a farm is attacked every day in South Africa. South Africa has the world’s highest murder rate, but the murder rate among white South Africans is three times higher than the national average, while that of white farmers is six times higher. Often, the victims are tortured and ill-treated for hours before being killed.
Since the end of apartheid in 1994, over 4 000 white farmers have been murdered. The police investigate these crimes only half-heartedly. The organisation ‘Genocide Watch’ warns of the threat of genocide.
Against the backdrop of continuing violence against white South Africans, 1,500 demonstrators protested in Pretoria in November 2017 and submitted a petition to the South African government.
1. Why has the Vice-President/High Representative not so far addressed the ongoing violence against white South Africans in the same way as genocide and/or human rights violations in other parts of the world?2. To what extent has the Vice-President/High Representative addressed and criticised the ongoing violence against white South Africans in bilateral talks with the South African government?4. To what extent is the Vice-President/High Representative taking steps to ensure that the protection of white South African farmers is a prerequisite for the conclusion of EU development assistance or development cooperation programmes with the South African government or partners?
VP/HR — Continued violence against white South Africans
In South Africa, white farmers have for years been exposed to an unprecedented wave of violence. Statistically, a farm is attacked every day in South Africa. South Africa has the world’s highest murder rate, but the murder rate among white South Africans is three times higher than the national average, while that of white farmers is six times higher. Often, the victims are tortured and ill-treated for hours before being killed.
Since the end of apartheid in 1994, over 4 000 white farmers have been murdered. The police investigate these crimes only half-heartedly. The organisation ‘Genocide Watch’ warns of the threat of genocide.
Against the backdrop of continuing violence against white South Africans, 1,500 demonstrators protested in Pretoria in November 2017 and submitted a petition to the South African government.
1. Why has the Vice-President/High Representative not so far addressed the ongoing violence against white South Africans in the same way as genocide and/or human rights violations in other parts of the world?2. To what extent has the Vice-President/High Representative addressed and criticised the ongoing violence against white South Africans in bilateral talks with the South African government?4. To what extent is the Vice-President/High Representative taking steps to ensure that the protection of white South African farmers is a prerequisite for the conclusion of EU development assistance or development cooperation programmes with the South African government or partners?
Its 4 times lower than the national average
"Facts" aka cherry picked info that support your backwards horse shit at best
Theres nothing to cherry pick though. Theres no way of saying it without completely fabricating it
Negroes killing Negroes. Don't care. It doesn't matter. A pointless statistic.
Negroes targeting and murdering White people is what matters and they're doing it with help from the negro South Apefrican government.
So you acknowledge there is no genocide
i only believe you are fat
Definitely an attempted genocide of beautiful white people.
As an Afrikaner journalist, my heart bleeds for the plight of our white farmers, a community facing an escalating crisis that can only be described as a shadow of genocide. The facts on the ground paint a grim picture, one that the world often chooses to ignore.
Let us be clear: the chilling chant of "Kill the Boers, Kill the Farmer" by the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) is not mere rhetoric; it is a direct incitement to violence that resonates deeply within a society already grappling with staggering crime rates. While some may dismiss these words as political posturing, the reality for our farmers is one of rampant crime, theft, torture, and murder. These are not isolated incidents; they are a continuous assault on a vulnerable community, leaving a trail of bloodshed and despair across our farmlands.
The statistics, though often debated and manipulated, cannot hide the brutal truth. While overall crime is a national tragedy affecting all South Africans, the specific targeting of farmers, and particularly white farmers, for these heinous acts is undeniable. These are not just robberies; they are often accompanied by extreme violence, torture, and sexual assault, far exceeding what would be necessary for simple theft. This barbarity suggests a motive beyond mere criminality, hinting at a darker, more insidious agenda.
Then there is the issue of land. The government's policy of "land expropriation without compensation" is a dagger aimed at the heart of our agricultural sector and, by extension, our very existence. While presented as a means of rectifying historical injustices, in practice, it is a policy that undermines property rights, discourages investment, and threatens food security for all. It dispossesses our farmers of the land they have toiled on for generations, often with little to no meaningful payment, effectively rendering them landless and without a livelihood. This process, stripped of fair compensation and due process, bears a chilling resemblance to historical ethnic cleansing, where the economic base of a group is systematically dismantled.
Furthermore, the continuous efforts to undermine our security services and make all weapons illegal, particularly for self-defense, leave our farmers utterly exposed. In a country with one of the highest murder rates globally, where police response times in rural areas are often woefully inadequate, disarming law-abiding citizens, especially those in isolated areas, is an act of criminal negligence. It effectively leaves our farmers as sitting ducks, defenseless against the onslaught of armed criminals who operate with impunity. The proposed tightening of gun control, while ostensibly aimed at reducing crime, disproportionately impacts those who rely on firearms for their personal safety and the protection of their families and livelihoods.
We are told that "genocide" is too strong a word, that there is no state-sponsored intent to destroy our people. But when political leaders openly call for our deaths, when our land is systematically taken without redress, when our ability to defend ourselves is eroded, and when brutal murders on farms are met with what often feels like official indifference, what else are we to call it? The legal definition of genocide includes acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. When the specific characteristics of these attacks, the rhetoric accompanying them, and the policies targeting our economic foundation are viewed collectively, a chilling pattern emerges.
The international community must open its eyes. The plight of white farmers in South Africa is not merely a crime problem; it is a human rights crisis, a potential slow-motion genocide that demands urgent attention and intervention. We are a people fighting for our survival, and we will not be silenced.
Let us be clear: the chilling chant of "Kill the Boers, Kill the Farmer" by the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) is not mere rhetoric; it is a direct incitement to violence that resonates deeply within a society already grappling with staggering crime rates. While some may dismiss these words as political posturing, the reality for our farmers is one of rampant crime, theft, torture, and murder. These are not isolated incidents; they are a continuous assault on a vulnerable community, leaving a trail of bloodshed and despair across our farmlands.
The statistics, though often debated and manipulated, cannot hide the brutal truth. While overall crime is a national tragedy affecting all South Africans, the specific targeting of farmers, and particularly white farmers, for these heinous acts is undeniable. These are not just robberies; they are often accompanied by extreme violence, torture, and sexual assault, far exceeding what would be necessary for simple theft. This barbarity suggests a motive beyond mere criminality, hinting at a darker, more insidious agenda.
Then there is the issue of land. The government's policy of "land expropriation without compensation" is a dagger aimed at the heart of our agricultural sector and, by extension, our very existence. While presented as a means of rectifying historical injustices, in practice, it is a policy that undermines property rights, discourages investment, and threatens food security for all. It dispossesses our farmers of the land they have toiled on for generations, often with little to no meaningful payment, effectively rendering them landless and without a livelihood. This process, stripped of fair compensation and due process, bears a chilling resemblance to historical ethnic cleansing, where the economic base of a group is systematically dismantled.
Furthermore, the continuous efforts to undermine our security services and make all weapons illegal, particularly for self-defense, leave our farmers utterly exposed. In a country with one of the highest murder rates globally, where police response times in rural areas are often woefully inadequate, disarming law-abiding citizens, especially those in isolated areas, is an act of criminal negligence. It effectively leaves our farmers as sitting ducks, defenseless against the onslaught of armed criminals who operate with impunity. The proposed tightening of gun control, while ostensibly aimed at reducing crime, disproportionately impacts those who rely on firearms for their personal safety and the protection of their families and livelihoods.
We are told that "genocide" is too strong a word, that there is no state-sponsored intent to destroy our people. But when political leaders openly call for our deaths, when our land is systematically taken without redress, when our ability to defend ourselves is eroded, and when brutal murders on farms are met with what often feels like official indifference, what else are we to call it? The legal definition of genocide includes acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. When the specific characteristics of these attacks, the rhetoric accompanying them, and the policies targeting our economic foundation are viewed collectively, a chilling pattern emerges.
The international community must open its eyes. The plight of white farmers in South Africa is not merely a crime problem; it is a human rights crisis, a potential slow-motion genocide that demands urgent attention and intervention. We are a people fighting for our survival, and we will not be silenced.
Idk why you keep repeating this when the numbers are completely against you
The homicide rate for white south africans is about the same as the US national homicide rate
The US national homicide rate includes that of negroes and spics which significantly increases the number.
The white South Africans are being targeted and murdered by blacks and are not receiving any help from the government. In fact, the SA government has institutionalized racial discrimination against their most productive citizens. The government has made it clear that murdering whites will not result in more protections for them.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/05/genocide-against-white-south-africans-facts-number/
It also includes the hundreds of millions of whites who are not being killed? You are retarded
No they're not. Again, white south africans are massively under-represented in homicide rates in proportion to their population
