Twitter is trying to 1v1 Trump

20200529_180719.png


They went from putting a warning on his post to actually censoring POTUS

I think this is now a criminal offence
 
Jack, the CEO of twitter has endorse tweets advocating Jihad for the Palestinians stone-throwers.

If the left did not have double standards, they wouldn't have double standards at all.

My guess is they are using this to push the Executive Order in Court. They want to see what POTUS does.

What should happen is eminent domain to be used seizing Twitter. Many Conservatives I talked to are against it because of "government control". However eminent domain does not require the government officials to run things.
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
Jack, the CEO of twitter has endorse tweets advocating Jihad for the Palestinians stone-throwers.

If the left did not have double standards, they wouldn't have double standards at all.

My guess is they are using this to push the Executive Order in Court. They want to see what POTUS does.

What should happen is eminent domain to be used seizing Twitter. Many Conservatives I talked to are against it because of "government control". However eminent domain does not require the government officials to run things.
Not arguing on behalf and Jack and co. But, the precedent of that sort of action would be the government seizing a business. Remember, when you grant power to one side, when the other side is in power they have the option to do it also. (See Senate nuclear option) I'm not saying that Jack and Co aren't out of line but, the very same leftists would jizz their pants if this happened because of what they could do in the future.

For an example of ED gone wild. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
I understand that argument, but they already own 90% of the media, with exception to talk radio and OAN. So what would they "take back"? The same media they already own.
It wouldn't be restricted to a type of business. They could target any business. Is my point. Dorsey is just a weasel. Zuck made a statement which suggests he nibbled at the red pill. I don't know. But, once the government has power, they will use it. It is our duty to purposefully restrict granting of power.
 
It wouldn't be restricted to a type of business. They could target any business. Is my point. Dorsey is just a weasel. Zuck made a statement which suggests he nibbled at the red pill. I don't know. But, once the government has power, they will use it. It is our duty to purposefully restrict granting of power.

Zucc is still a Cuck, but between him, Hoffman, and Dorsey he's the more tolerable.
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
@umkemesik
@lazarus+

It would pertain to the direction of the DOJ and they would handle the details.
Just like DACA. Obama signed the order and various departments ignored illegal immigration and refused to transfer prisoners.
 
Back
Top Bottom