• Pool's Opened

charlie kirk shot by liberal

white man says gun violence is a necessary evil
is killed by a gun the same day

coincidence? i think NOT
i'm not the first to bring it up, i still find it amusing
 

Call Me Tim

EDF Hero
white man says gun violence is a necessary evil
is killed by a gun the same day

coincidence? i think NOT
i'm not the first to bring it up, i still am a retard.
You're a simpleton.
The premise behind CK's "gun violence is a necessary evil," doesn't excuse or justify his murder you sub-zero IQ fuckwit.

It's a statement which says criminals will be criminals and one has to accept that criminals exist. However, the actions of criminals shouldn't impede the non-criminal's rights to __whatever__, speech, guns, cars, pet ownership, etc.,
Right?

Or are you so stupid to think that if you stopped gun ownership in it's most absolute form in the US, that any great amount of violence will stop? If need be I can cite numerous examples, many recent, that will prove you wrong.

But we all know you're not one for logic.
 
You're a simpleton.
The premise behind CK's "gun violence is a necessary evil," doesn't excuse or justify his murder you sub-zero IQ fuckwit.

It's a statement which says criminals will be criminals and one has to accept that criminals exist. However, the actions of criminals shouldn't impede the non-criminal's rights to __whatever__, speech, guns, cars, pet ownership, etc.,
Right?

Or are you so stupid to think that if you stopped gun ownership in it's most absolute form in the US, that any great amount of violence will stop? If need be I can cite numerous examples, many recent, that will prove you wrong.

But we all know you're not one for logic.
tim i'm not going to let you ruin my fun by being an angry old man on the interwebs
 
You're a simpleton.
The premise behind CK's "gun violence is a necessary evil," doesn't excuse or justify his murder you sub-zero IQ fuckwit.

It's a statement which says criminals will be criminals and one has to accept that criminals exist. However, the actions of criminals shouldn't impede the non-criminal's rights to __whatever__, speech, guns, cars, pet ownership, etc.,
Right?

Or are you so stupid to think that if you stopped gun ownership in it's most absolute form in the US, that any great amount of violence will stop? If need be I can cite numerous examples, many recent, that will prove you wrong.

But we all know you're not one for logic.
IMG_6085.jpeg
 
Back
Top Bottom