LOL
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
thats exactly what he was saying, literally what every groyper says about the coverage
Re read his post. Paraphrasing him, "ANTIFAggots are being blamed BECAUSE they are white."
The drive by is an example of ANTIFAggots
Fuetes' YouTube Army seems to want to "re-balance" the coverage and have them focus on TV Liberators by giving them bricks. And with the TV reporters to quickly take the WN narrative, it would appear that yes WN are all taking part in this and this is driven by the WN. When in fact it's ANTIFAggots. Fuentes YTA is being played. If arrested they will be labeled as ANTIFAggots and no one will care whether it's the truth or not.

i dont know why youre using that name if you completely disagree with groyper ideas and they all want you dead
Apparently satire is above your level. And meh. 2nd type are only brave when they are assured that I can't fight back. 1st type don't have the numbers to stand and fight.
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
>Fuentes and his fans hate authority
Have you watched 1 episode of his show?
No. I generally don't watch YT vids when the host is posting drivel largely driven by emotion. But, I presume his vids often are upset with the authority forcing them to capitulate to the globo-homo mission? Which according to them is run by whom?
 
Re read his post. Paraphrasing him, "ANTIFAggots are being blamed BECAUSE they are white."
The drive by is an example of ANTIFAggots
Fuetes' YouTube Army seems to want to "re-balance" the coverage and have them focus on TV Liberators by giving them bricks. And with the TV reporters to quickly take the WN narrative, it would appear that yes WN are all taking part in this and this is driven by the WN. When in fact it's ANTIFAggots. Fuentes YTA is being played. If arrested they will be labeled as ANTIFAggots and no one will care whether it's the truth or not.


Apparently satire is above your level. And meh. 2nd type are only brave when they are assured that I can't fight back. 1st type don't have the numbers to stand and fight.
No. I generally don't watch YT vids when the host is posting drivel largely driven by emotion. But, I presume his vids often are upset with the authority forcing them to capitulate to the globo-homo mission? Which according to them is run by whom?
Why are you writing essays on stuff you literally a minute later admit you know nothing about
 
No. I generally don't watch YT vids when the host is posting drivel largely driven by emotion. But, I presume his vids often are upset with the authority forcing them to capitulate to the globo-homo mission? Which according to them is run by whom?
Well, you know. The people that run the ✡government✡ and ✡media✡.
Fuentes is actually very reasonable if you're able to see things from his side. I think you have no idea what you're talking about.
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
Why are you writing essays on stuff you literally a minute later admit you know nothing about
I am basing that off of his twitter post which you posted. However unpretentious his first videos were, or how camouflaged his true opinions were, later on it is apparent he wants only white leadership in the Groypers. You link those many statements with his latest, "pitty the poor whyte peeples in ANTIFAggot" twitter post, and it's not hard to begin to see something is lurking under the surface. The other observations are well documented. I don't know what you are talking about.

Are you saying in order to "truly understand" someone's limp dick opinion, I have to like and subscribe? Fuck off.
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
Well, you know. The people that run the ✡government✡ and ✡media✡.
Fuentes is actually very reasonable if you're able to see things from his side. I think you have no idea what you're talking about.
And if you dont' completely agree with his point of view you're unreasonable?

Gee where did I hear that before? Oh I remember, ANTIFAggots say something very similar. Perhaps that's why he's running media interference for them. He may not completely believe their cause, but believe in their whiteness? Please.
 
I am basing that off of his twitter post which you posted. However unpretentious his first videos were, or how camouflaged his true opinions were, later on it is apparent he wants only white leadership in the Groypers. You link those many statements with his latest, "pitty the poor whyte peeples in ANTIFAggot" twitter post, and it's not hard to begin to see something is lurking under the surface. The other observations are well documented. I don't know what you are talking about.

Are you saying in order to "truly understand" someone limp dick opinion, I have to like and subscribe? Fuck off.
Have you watched 1 episode of his show?
Why are you writing essays on stuff you literally a minute later admit you know nothing about
You really need mental help
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
You really need mental help
Says the guy sitting in his game room over 12,000 miles away commenting on stuff seen on YT, Twitter, and reddit and drawing concrete conclusions from them.
Fuetes like you is no deep thinker.

You telling me that I need mental help has all the substance of that 58 year old pre-op accusing me of racism. None.
 
I am basing that off of his twitter post which you posted. However unpretentious his first videos were, or how camouflaged his true opinions were, later on it is apparent he wants only white leadership in the Groypers. You link those many statements with his latest, "pitty the poor whyte peeples in ANTIFAggot" twitter post, and it's not hard to begin to see something is lurking under the surface. The other observations are well documented. I don't know what you are talking about.

Are you saying in order to "truly understand" someone's limp dick opinion, I have to like and subscribe? Fuck off.
Do you know of Michele Malkin? She's asian and he only has good things to say about her. He considers her one of the leaders of his "movement" (even though he seems to typically despise women in leadership positions he considers her to be an exception)
When has he excused lefties? He's just said that saying antifa is the real culprit this is excusing the fact that black people are behind the majority of the damage in the riots. Shifting attention from the colour of the 50000 rioters to 50 white people that are giving them bricks.
Or maybe you think he's so racist right winger he's actually a leftist, horseshoe theory style.
And if you dont' completely agree with his point of view you're unreasonable?

Gee where did I hear that before? Oh I remember, ANTIFAggots say something very similar. Perhaps that's why he's running media interference for them. He may not completely believe their cause, but believe in their whiteness? Please.
Oh, you actually do! LMFAO
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
Do you know of Michele Malkin? She's asian and he only has good things to say about her. He considers her one of the leaders of his "movement" (even though he seems to typically despise women in leadership positions he considers her to be an exception)
When has he excused lefties? He's just said that saying antifa is the real culprit this is excusing the fact that black people are behind the majority of the damage in the riots. Shifting attention from the colour of the 50000 rioters to 50 white people that are giving them bricks.
Or maybe you think he's so racist right winger he's actually a leftist, horseshoe theory style.

Oh, you actually do! LMFAO
When did you starting to go to raves bro?
Malkin is a token "leader" then.

Shifting the attention to ANTIFAggots is correct. There are three distinctively different levels of "civil unrest" simultaneously going on: people screaming; people looting; and people instigating and escalating violence, and committing murder. Not to say there isn't some overlap in the last two but the dindu that is trying to get the new Jordans, is really not out there to make a political statement or alter gov. policy. The last is. The last is the real threat. ANTIFAggots are using the first two groups as camouflage so they can get in and do their thing. It's really not that complicated. It's been pretty obvious, because the left cannot and has not come up with a new idea since 1848.
 
When did you starting to go to raves bro?
Malkin is a token "leader" then.

Shifting the attention to ANTIFAggots is correct. There are three distinctively different levels of "civil unrest" simultaneously going on: people screaming; people looting; and people instigating and escalating violence, and committing murder. Not to say there isn't some overlap in the last two but the dindu that is trying to get the new Jordans, is really not out there to make a political statement or alter gov. policy. The last is. The last is the real threat. ANTIFAggots are using the first two groups as camouflage so they can get in and do their thing. It's really not that complicated. It's been pretty obvious, because the left cannot and has not come up with a new idea since 1848.
She supported njf indipedently. Again you have no idea what youre talking about
Niggers are causing the trouble and ✡they✡ are taking advantage of it, yes. This is obvious and nick wouldnt disagree
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
She supported njf indipedently. Again you have no idea what youre talking about
Niggers are causing the trouble and ✡they✡ are taking advantage of it, yes. This is obvious and nick wouldnt disagree
She supports him independently because she got shitcanned when speaking at one of his rallies.
I would be concerned but all of this doesn't mean dick to me since I'm 12000 miles away. All of this is for the lulz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom