Fuck the Irish.

Which ones exactly? You are off your rocker more than usual.
Stone and Manafort ran the most notorious foreign lobbying agency in history

Flynn, unregisted agent for Turkey

Papadopolis, Israel and Russia

Bannon, unregistered agent for Egypt, UAE, Saudi Arabia

Kushner unregistered, Qatar, UAE

should i go on
 
Screenshot_20200610-235757_Chrome.jpg
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
Stone and Manafort ran the most notorious foreign lobbying agency in history

Flynn, unregisted agent for Turkey

Papadopolis, Israel and Russia

Bannon, unregistered agent for Egypt, UAE, Saudi Arabia

Kushner unregistered, Qatar, UAE

should i go on
You're saying Flynn is working for Turkey. Seriously. et. al. LOL ok.
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
You do realise that the military etc, of the United Kingdom swear allegiance to the queen, and nobody else

Right?
This isn't the 1600's.

And I and every other US service member swears an allegiance to the United States to protect it from terror both foreign and domestic. That doesn't inherently mean I break off and join some totalitarian government. I also doesn't mean I gear up and start laying waste to ANTIFAggots.
 
This isn't the 1600's.

And I and every other US service member swears an allegiance to the United States to protect it from terror both foreign and domestic. That doesn't inherently mean I break off and join some totalitarian government. I also doesn't mean I gear up and start laying waste to ANTIFAggots.
You completely misunderstand the conversation

The military, police, other services swear allegiance to the queen and her heirs. They do not swear allegiance to the country or the government

The monarchy legally abolishing a government that has become the enemy of the people is exactly what they would support
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
You completely misunderstand the conversation

The military, police, other services swear allegiance to the queen and her heirs. They do not swear allegiance to the country or the government

The monarchy legally abolishing a government that has become the enemy of the people is exactly what they would support
On paper. Reality would be much different I assure you.
 
Saying that the US stalling game is evidence of corruption?
I said the system is corrupt as in corrupted. Not that those actions in and of themselves are acts of corruption

Holding up postions so you can fill them with people who will adjudicate how you want the country to be ran is indeed corrupting the system that was put into place




Next
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
I said the system is corrupt as in corrupted. Not that those actions in and of themselves are acts of corruption

Holding up postions so you can fill them with people who will adjudicate how you want the country to be ran is indeed corrupting the system that was put into place




Next
Mitigating factor: Trump fired Flynn.
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
I said the system is corrupt as in corrupted. Not that those actions in and of themselves are acts of corruption

Holding up postions so you can fill them with people who will adjudicate how you want the country to be ran is indeed corrupting the system that was put into place




Next
But, the example you gave was not an indicator of corruption. You only used that point to lead into a completely different subject and topic. Does not follow.
 
But, the example you gave was not an indicator of corruption. You only used that point to lead into a completely different subject and topic. Does not follow.
This is another case of you not understanding english. Find an instance of me being wrong

Mitigating factor: Trump fired Flynn.
What has that got to do with it
 
Yeah the Republicans totally didnt hold up every vacant federal judicial position possible until they had a president in power so they could fill those positions with their hand picked people

Democrats did the same thing. But in any case that wasn't the original way government-operated.

Filibusters are relatively a new contrivence. They are based on Senate rules that have not been changed, except recently when the democrats decided to end filibusters for appointments.

I would argue that filibusters are unconstitutional since they require 60 votes and not the Constitution's mandated 50 votes
 
Back
Top Bottom