I just need a CheckUser done on a possible vengeful WhiteKnight

Volkamer

Newfag
There's an article that I created and have been added to for too long a while along with one other regular contributor. Once in a while a new name shows up but it's usually just the other person sockpuppeting. This time though I have reason to believe that it's a white knight of the person that the article is about.
I don't expect to have the irrelevant crap they added removed, though it should be seeing as how it's an unnecessary sub paragraph about a friend of somebody that the subject of the article used to be friends with.
Anyway, if it is indeed who I think it is, it'll not only be hilarious, but it'll be excellent fodder for the article. The 'mystery' contributor refers to another person as a tranny and deadnames them while, themselves, being transgender and often virtue signals. Regardless of someones stance on transgenderism, the in-fighting and hypocrisy here is delicious.
The 'mystery' contributor also insults this tertiary person by calling them a NEET, pointing out that they live with their mom at 21, makes fun of them for making some band their personality and for kinning with dead baby dolls, questions the legitimacy of somebody else's claim of abuse, and criticises them for asking for donations. All the while the person that this article is about and for whom this 'mystery' contributor is white-knighting for, has done these things at least once and over periods no less than a year.

I tried to email somebody to have this done but I didn't get a response in regards to my question. They addressed the other topic of the email but that's all.
I don't need to know anything specific. So long as the IP isn't from New Mexico, Oklahoma or Wisconsin, then I can be more sure of who it is, but not certain. I know what state they live in and knowing just that would be enough as it would be an extremely unlikely coincidence that some random from the same state just happened upon this drama and decided to chime in about such specific things. And if it is who I think it is, they also sent the tertiary person a private message referring to them as a faggot after the persons full legal name and address.
I'm not too worried about having their dumb shit removed from the article. I'm just eager to find out for sure if it is who I think it is. It would be hugely beneficial to the article as well as the lulz.
 
Lovecraft

Lovecraft

Dramacrat
Volkamer said:
There's an article that I created and have been added to for too long a while along with one other regular contributor. Once in a while a new name shows up but it's usually just the other person sockpuppeting. This time though I have reason to believe that it's a white knight of the person that the article is about.
I don't expect to have the irrelevant crap they added removed, though it should be seeing as how it's an unnecessary sub paragraph about a friend of somebody that the subject of the article used to be friends with.
Anyway, if it is indeed who I think it is, it'll not only be hilarious, but it'll be excellent fodder for the article. The 'mystery' contributor refers to another person as a tranny and deadnames them while, themselves, being transgender and often virtue signals. Regardless of someones stance on transgenderism, the in-fighting and hypocrisy here is delicious.
The 'mystery' contributor also insults this tertiary person by calling them a NEET, pointing out that they live with their mom at 21, makes fun of them for making some band their personality and for kinning with dead baby dolls, questions the legitimacy of somebody else's claim of abuse, and criticises them for asking for donations. All the while the person that this article is about and for whom this 'mystery' contributor is white-knighting for, has done these things at least once and over periods no less than a year.

I tried to email somebody to have this done but I didn't get a response in regards to my question. They addressed the other topic of the email but that's all.
I don't need to know anything specific. So long as the IP isn't from New Mexico, Oklahoma or Wisconsin, then I can be more sure of who it is, but not certain. I know what state they live in and knowing just that would be enough as it would be an extremely unlikely coincidence that some random from the same state just happened upon this drama and decided to chime in about such specific things. And if it is who I think it is, they also sent the tertiary person a private message referring to them as a faggot after the persons full legal name and address.
I'm not too worried about having their dumb shit removed from the article. I'm just eager to find out for sure if it is who I think it is. It would be hugely beneficial to the article as well as the lulz.
Click to expand...
This sounds hugely important and somebody will get right on it with all due haste, lest some uninteresting article about some nobody on the mangled corpse of a once slightly relevant wiki is defaced.
 

Volkamer

Newfag
Lovecraft said:
This sounds hugely important and somebody will get right on it with all due haste, lest some uninteresting article about some nobody on the mangled corpse of a once slightly relevant wiki is defaced.
Click to expand...
I see that reading comprehension isn't your strength. That's okay though, I know you were super excited to talk down to a newly registered user and probably just skimmed the post. I won't hold it against you.
 
Jerry

Jerry

Dramacrat
Job Corps Pedobear
OMG THIS USER IS A 40 YEARS OLD OBESE BRAZILIAN PEDO Not the Sharpest Person Around Fail-Detective HUEHUEHUE
Volkamer said:
There's an article that I created and have been added to for too long a while along with one other regular contributor. Once in a while a new name shows up but it's usually just the other person sockpuppeting. This time though I have reason to believe that it's a white knight of the person that the article is about.
I don't expect to have the irrelevant crap they added removed, though it should be seeing as how it's an unnecessary sub paragraph about a friend of somebody that the subject of the article used to be friends with.
Anyway, if it is indeed who I think it is, it'll not only be hilarious, but it'll be excellent fodder for the article. The 'mystery' contributor refers to another person as a tranny and deadnames them while, themselves, being transgender and often virtue signals. Regardless of someones stance on transgenderism, the in-fighting and hypocrisy here is delicious.
The 'mystery' contributor also insults this tertiary person by calling them a NEET, pointing out that they live with their mom at 21, makes fun of them for making some band their personality and for kinning with dead baby dolls, questions the legitimacy of somebody else's claim of abuse, and criticises them for asking for donations. All the while the person that this article is about and for whom this 'mystery' contributor is white-knighting for, has done these things at least once and over periods no less than a year.

I tried to email somebody to have this done but I didn't get a response in regards to my question. They addressed the other topic of the email but that's all.
I don't need to know anything specific. So long as the IP isn't from New Mexico, Oklahoma or Wisconsin, then I can be more sure of who it is, but not certain. I know what state they live in and knowing just that would be enough as it would be an extremely unlikely coincidence that some random from the same state just happened upon this drama and decided to chime in about such specific things. And if it is who I think it is, they also sent the tertiary person a private message referring to them as a faggot after the persons full legal name and address.
I'm not too worried about having their dumb shit removed from the article. I'm just eager to find out for sure if it is who I think it is. It would be hugely beneficial to the article as well as the lulz.
Click to expand...
I Post TLDRS and I cant even understand or find what your trying to say Because its buried under all this text you should next time get straight onto the point
 
Lovecraft

Lovecraft

Dramacrat
Volkamer said:
I see that reading comprehension isn't your strength. That's okay though, I know you were super excited to talk down to a newly registered user and probably just skimmed the post. I won't hold it against you.
Click to expand...
Didn't read.
People who actually care about shitty attack articles  never have anything worthwhile to say.
 

Volkamer

Newfag
Retarded_FAG said:
I Post TLDRS and I cant even understand or find what your trying to say Because its buried under all this text you should next time get straight onto the point
Click to expand...
I need to see if a white knight is sockpuppeting. Epic lulz if yes.
Hows that ;)
SOX said:
I'm not reading all that, just kys. It'll solve all your problems.
Click to expand...
Already did. That's how I'm in hell and having to read your strained effort to own.
Lovecraft said:
Didn't read.
People who actually care about shitty attack articles  never have anything worthwhile to say.
Click to expand...
If only your dads condom tried as hard as you are :(
 

Volkamer

Newfag
Retarded_FAG said:
Much better as for the answer to the question ask Sneed or mariomario456
Click to expand...
MarioMario456 is who initially got my email which was asking about the CheckUser and something else. I followed up and haven't heard back and wasn't sure if Mario is just up to his nuts in Mod stuff or if he just doesn't care (most likely scenario). In either case, I still wanted to exhaust whatever avenues were available to me to get the information I wanted.

If asking about it here is just a dead end littered with bored tryhards, so be it. No harm in asking. Thanks for the actual answer though. Time to go do literally anything else and forget about EDF for another decade.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom