Jeet fags up the bomb.

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
jeet.PNG

“They should not allow mentally ill people near weapons of mass destruction.” That was one of dozens of derogatory tweets that the Vienna Center for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation received in response to a December 2022 panel discussion on LGBTQ+ identity in the nuclear weapons space. Most of these tweets were purely hateful, written by trolls. But some respondents explained their opposition, saying that talk about queerness was inserting a non-issue and “derailing” discussions of nuclear weapons. All showed a keen determination to misunderstand the purpose of the event.

While the event received an outpouring of vocal and wide-reaching support from some of the best-known figures in the nuclear field, the disparaging tweets illustrated the common belief that queer identity has no relevance for nuclear policy, and that examining the relationship between queerness and nuclear policy is intended to push a social agenda rather than to address substantive issues.

Excerpt from her retarded paper.
The conscious and subconscious biases that inform who is allowed into the field, and therefore who is allowed access to nuclear and national secrets, have resulted in unwarranted scrutiny of women, people of color, and other historically underrepresented groups and their subsequent exclusion or marginalized participation in the field. To illustrate this phenomenon, U.S. government reports show that qualified applicants with foreign ties have been discouraged from applying to sensitive national security positions and faced barriers to obtaining a security clearance. This is in part due to preconceived confirmation biases held by investigators about certain racial or ethnic groups.12 In recent news reports, statements by intelligence officials, and studies conducted by Blue Star Families and RAND Corporation, racial bias was seen as a significant factor that negatively affects the careers of diplomats, military personnel, veterans, and members of the intelligence community. These reports drew attention to the structural nature of exclusion in the security infrastructure.13Bias and exclusion based on sex have also pervaded women’s participation in some security spaces. A U.S. Department of Defense culture study found that sexism in the armed forces resulted in men perceiving women as less capable and competent.


Jeet made the bomb gay
Merica is fucked
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
I personally love bombs, whether they are gay or not. Anyway, my question is, since when can any civilian (gay or not) have access to a weapon of mass desctruction? Is this a 'Murica thing I'm an aware of? I shouldn't be surprised because the 2A just says "arms" which means weapons in general.
Yes and no.
yes you can have bombs: grenades, flash bangs, and smoke bombs are included in this. They are an NFA item. You pay a tax per item, some you still have to get a license and or certification, then you can buy them.

No such license is required for buying tannerite, a powder that blows up when shot, (Youtube is full of retards injuring themselves blowing stuff up with it) or gun powder, or dynamite. (you're limited to how much you can purchase at a time if you don't have the proper licensing.)

Survival of the non-fittest gold medal winners.



However, it is illegal to make IED's which include pipebombs. Which makes no fucking sense. If can buy a literal hand grenade or a working RPG round, but you can't have a pipe bomb. Pay a tax to own, basically. Everything the ATF (Assholes, Tards, and Fuckheads) does doesn't make sense and is unconstitutional.
The only thing the ATF is good at is killing your pets.
 
Back
Top Bottom