The (((Pfizer))) Contract Leaked; A Thread

leaky.jpg

PFIZERLEAK: EXPOSING THE PFIZER MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT. (thread) Background: Pfizer has been extremely aggressive in trying to protect the details of their international COVID19 vaccine agreements. Luckily, I've managed to get one.

Because the cost of developing contracts is very high and time consuming (legal review cycles), Pfizer, like all corporations, develop a standardized agreement template and use these agreements with relatively minor adjustments in different countries.

These agreements are confidential, but luckily one country did not protect the contract document well enough, so I managed to get a hold of a copy.

As you are about to see, there is a good reason why Pfizer was fighting to hide the details of these contracts.

First, let's talk about the product:
The agreement not only covers manufacturing of vaccines for COVID19 and its mutations, but also for "any device, technology, or product used in the administration of or to enhance the use or effect of, such vaccine".

If you were wondering why #Ivermectin was suppressed, well, it is because the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does not allow them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will be found to treat COVID19 the contract cannot be voided.

Supplying the product:

"Pfizer shall have no liability for any failure to deliver doses in accordance with any estimated delivery dates... nor shall any such failure give Purchaser any right to cancel orders for any quantities of Product."

"Pfizer shall decide on necessary adjustments to the number of Contracted Doses and Delivery Schedule due to the Purchaser ... based on principles to be determined by Pfizer ... Purchaser shall be deemed to agree to any revision."

Just to make it clear:
"Purchaser hereby waives all rights and remedies that it may have at Law, in equity or otherwise, arising from or relating to:.. any failure by Pfizer to deliver the Contracted Doses in accordance with the Delivery Schedule."

Once again: "Under no circumstances will Pfizer be subject to or liable for any late delivery penalties."

You can't return the product, no matter what:

"Pfizer will not, in any circumstances, accept any returns of Product (or any dose)...no Product returns may take place under any circumstances."

Now for the BIG SECRET:
$12 per dosage for about 250K units.

Funny that this is the price for a small amount of dosages when Pfizer was charging the US $19.50 per dose.

US taxpayers got screwed by Pfizer, probably also Israel.

About payment, the country has no right "to withhold, offset, recoup or debit any amounts owed to Pfizer, whether under this Agreement or otherwise, against any other amount owed (or to become due and owing) to it by Pfizer or a Pfizer Affiliate."

Damaged goods:
THE ONLY WAY to get a recall is if you can prove cGMP fault.

"For clarity, Purchaser shall not be entitled to reject any Product based on service complaints unless a Product does not materially conform to Specifications or cGMP."

This agreement is above any local law of the state.

Long term effects and efficiency:

"Purchaser acknowledges...the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known."

Termination for cause:
There are clauses about termination possibility, but in fact, as you saw so far, the buyer has almost nothing that can be considered a material breach, while Pfizer can easily do so if they don't get their money or if they deem so.

You must pay Pfizer for the dosages you ordered, no matter how much you consumed, regardless if Pfizer got it approved (it was a pre-EU approval) or if they delivered the Contracted Doses in accordance with any estimated delivery dates set forth herein.

"Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS Pfizer, BioNTech (and) their Affiliates...from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses..."

The state must defend Pfizer:
"(Pfizer) shall notify Purchaser of Losses for which it is seeking indemnification... Upon such notification, Purchaser shall promptly assume conduct and control of the defense of such Indemnified Claims on behalf of (Pfizer)"

However, "Pfizer shall have the right to assume control of such defense... and Purchaser shall pay all Losses, including, without limitation, the reasonable attorneys’ fees and other expenses incurred."

Pfizer is making sure the country will pay for everything:
"Costs and expenses, including... fees and disbursements of counsel, incurred by the Indemnitee(s) in connection with any Indemnified Claim shall be reimbursed on a quarterly basis by Purchaser"

Liability:
"this shall not include, nor constitute, product liability insurance to cover any third party/patients claims and such general liability insurance shall be without prejudice to Purchaser’s indemnification obligation as set out in this Agreement."

There is no limit to the liability of the country in case of:
"the indemnity given by it under Section 8 (Indemnification)" or if the Purchaser failed to pay Pfizer"

The Purchaser waives any right for immunity, it give up any law that might cap the obligation to pay damages to Pfizer.
Comment: The court is in NY has the capacity to hold international assets of a country if the country failed the contract.

Condition to supply:
Purchaser must provide Pfizer protection from liability for claims and all Losses, must implement it via statutory or regulatory requirements, and the sufficiency of such efforts shall be in Pfizer’s sole discretion.

Confidentiality, part 1:
"Each Recipient shall safeguard the confidential and proprietary nature of the Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information with at least the same degree of care as it holds its own confidential or proprietary information of like kind"

Confidentiality, part 2:
"Recipient shall disclose Confidential Information only to such of its Representatives who have a need to know such Confidential Information to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement"

Confidentiality, part 3:
The contract must be kept confidential for 10 years.
Why 30yrs in Israel?

"The provisions of this Section 10 (Confidential Information) shall survive the termination or expiration of the this Agreement for a period of ten (10) years"

Arbitration & governing laws:

Arbitration must be done in New York, in according to Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce, govern by the laws of the State of New York, USA.

If specific ministry was assigned to safeguard the contract they must continue to so:
"...attempted assignment of rights or delegation or subcontracting of duties without the required prior written consent of the other Parties shall be void and ineffective."

FINALLY, after I finished to go over the contract summarizing all the elements in it that are important, it is time to reveal the name of the country from which it was leaked.

And the winner is ...
pfizer: we write the contracts that write your laws
 
round 2. FIGHT!
PFIZERLEAK: NEW CONTRACT / NEW COUNTRY !

EXPOSING THE PFIZER MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT.
(thread)

For those who wanted a proof that the #Pfizer contract is real - here 100% proof: ANOTHER contract, this time validated using a digital signature.

IT IS REAL!

And the contract of the day is....

BRAZIL !!!!

Signed by Roberto Ferreira Dias, Director of the Logistics Department.

More about this person below.

Here is a link to the document via the digital signature validation website.

Mr. Roberto Ferreira Dias, who signed the #Pfizer contract, was arrested earlier this month for lying in Brazilian Covid's CPI, a special committee investigating the COVID19 activities. He is accused of asking for a US$ 1 bribe from AZ....
pfizer: all your country are belong to us. you have no chance survive make your time.
 

Haha Yes

Fart that wont go away
CAN U PUT THIS IN LAYMAN TERMZ AND POSSIBLY UNDER 20 WORDS IM NOT READING THAT SHIT NIGGA. PEACE
Taxpayers pay for the disease/kill shot.
Then the Obamacare act doesn’t pay the medical consequences for experimental jab.
Oh and taxpayers pay to be deceived into paying the costs of their own extermination.
 
And that's why every country, or alliance of little countries, should develope and finance a big statal pharmaceutical company or conglomerate.

Same as most roads, water supplies, justice departments and police corps are controled by the state, to try to keep the worst excesses of our pseudo-capitalism under relative control, it's quite evident to me that the same should be done with medicines and healthcare.

Wait... did I mention statal healthcare??

índice.jpg
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
And that's why every country, or alliance of little countries, should develope and finance a big statal pharmaceutical company or conglomerate.

Same as most roads, water supplies, justice departments and police corps are controled by the state, to try to keep the worst excesses of our pseudo-capitalism under relative control, it's quite evident to me that the same should be done with medicines and healthcare.
I dont' see how federal control will make this type of power non-corruptible. I mean history is replete with examples.

The corporations don't care about you. They care about your money. You can fight back by not buying their product.
The government doesn't care about you. They care about your money. You go to jail if you don't buy their product.
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
Biden: Take the vaccine folks. It's just common, eh, common, eh. common, eh. *System Obama 2.5 rebooting...... systems checks.....ok..... BIOS check..... check sum error......... Loading kernel.....*
 
The corporations don't care about you. They care about your money. You can fight back by not buying their product.
The government doesn't care about you. They care about your money. You go to jail if you don't buy their product.

That's a gross simplification.

The corporations don't care about you. They care about your money. You can fight back by not buying their product... unless they pact a pseudo-monopoly, or at least a minimun price, in which case you are fucked up. Case in point: Covid vaccines... do you really think they cost 9$/dose to Michelle? To Moderna? To J&J? To Astrazeneca? Do you think they cost them 5 bucks? One buck? 50 Cents? we are getting close... :D

The government doesn't care about you. They care about your money vote. You go to jail if you don't buy their product....well, not really. I don't go jail for not using their roads, nor they charge me for using them, except some taxes, but only if I declare benefits, which isn't my case... in fact, it has been years already since the last time I had to pay a single dime in my annual rent declaration, and I still enjoy the benefits of a public healthcare system that would cost me literally thousands/month if I wanted to have the equivalent in the mainly private medical USA system.

To name a concrete example that I researched the last time I had here this same discussion: a single, diary dose of fast insulin, required TO LIVE for diabetics, cost me in Spain through healthcare around 5€. That VERY SAME dosis cost in USA, on average, 300$... THREE HUNDRED!! Every single fucking day!!... So no. Corporations are waaay more greedy and ruthless than goverments, at least in the western world. Let's not be silly in our anti-goberment rants, please.


There, ftfy
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
That's a gross simplification.
And that's what it was meant to be.

The corporations don't care about you. They care about your money. You can fight back by not buying their product... unless they pact a pseudo-monopoly, or at least a minimun price, in which case you are fucked up. Case in point: Covid vaccines... do you really think they cost 9$/dose to Michelle? To Moderna? To J&J? To Astrazeneca? Do you think they cost them 5 bucks? One buck? 50 Cents? we are getting close... :D
None of this makes any sense. What exactly is a pseduo -monopoly and how does one control the market or a minimum price? And the vaccine cost. what? Your nation has a maximum amount which phama can charge so it puts companies which develop interventions at a disadvantage. You can't claim a governmentally mandated low cost for products in your country evidence of corporate greed.

The government doesn't care about you. They care about your money vote.
It takes a million dollars to run for state representative, tens or hundreds of million for federal representative, depending on state, population, level, political advantage.
So it is all about money, where do you think it comes from? The US system may be radically different from your own. Once they get in their policies are about money. Vote for me and we'll have free school lunches. Well I don't want to buy that product, if I don't buy that product I go to jail.

I see a politician's policies as their product. Once their in, I have no choice in the matter whether to buy or not because taxes MUST be paid.
 
1º What exactly is a pseduo -monopoly and how does one control the market or a minimum price?

2º You can't claim a governmentally mandated low cost for products in your country evidence of corporate greed.

3º So it is all about money, where do you think it comes from? The US system may be radically different from your own.
Once they get in their policies are about money. Vote for me and we'll have free school lunches. Well I don't want to buy that product, if I don't buy that product I go to jail.

4º I see a politician's policies as their product. Once their in, I have no choice in the matter whether to buy or not because taxes MUST be paid.

1º It's the mechanisms that in a situation of global emergency, allow them to charge people and countries a 2000% marging of profit. Precisely.

Or 300$ for a dose of vital insulin that cost them cents to make. Precisely.

2º Where I did that? I have problems to even get that part.
I claim, if anything, that the grotesque prices pharma ask for their products when NOT stataly mandated to do otherwise is what it IS proof or corporate greed... I think you got my post exactly the other way around, lol

3º Money...power... yep, at certain level the disctinction can be moot. I have the feeling that past certain point of wealthy, power is what gets the boners...but anyways, that's just a detail.

Yes, the system is quite diffrent in my country and yours... here, parties are financed by public money through quotas, particular donations are minimal...not like you, with your mainly private money sources and PACS and SuperPACS that favour corruption greatly

But again, your main point that you "go to jail if you don't buy the political product" is simply bullshit. You keep repeting that while ignoring my counterexamples.... repetition doesn't give you justification, u know. How in the fuck can you go to jail in USA for not... I don't even understand your sentence... errr... not wanting schools to have free lunches? Lowut?

No, it isn't like that. For starters, you are directly mistaking politics with laws. On a technical level, yes, politicians end making laws, and you need to follow those, to an extent. But that ignores the fact that basically the same laws are approved whatever party is in charge. It's a process mainly independent of the desire of poblation and the politicians themselves. If you are a politician, maybe, and just maybe, if you expend all your political credit in forcing your pet law, you have 1/3 of possibilities of seeing it approved. Once. And then you are probably burned out.

4º Politicians are just puppets compiting for seats. One of the main puppeteers are corps, granted. But there are many others, like public opinion, strange l atractors due to sudden technical advances, Lady Luck, and many other we don't even understand, much less control. The Wire, the tv series, goes about that... there you can see how people at all level of power just basically strugle against "the Gods" trying to stay afloat and nothing more. No time to "sell" anything, except maybe how awesome I am so vote me again, pleeeease

Very little to do with being forced to spend 300$ every day to stay alive cause your goverment hasn't the bollocks to forbid pharmas to be that ruthless.

And you know what? In my country there is insulin available. At 5$. Cause it cost them cents... so there's still profit to make. Why do you refuse to aknowledge that huge point?

Taxes must be paid any way or another, be there one party or another... how is that relevant? How is that a signal that a politician is selling a product, same as a pharma corp? Your analogies seem to be incredibly forced to me, I'm afraid.
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
1º It's the mechanisms that in a situation of global emergency, allow them to charge people and countries a 2000% marging of profit. Precisely.

Or 300$ for a dose of vital insulin that cost them cents to make. Precisely.

2º Where I did that? I have problems to even get that part.
I claim, if anything, that the grotesque prices pharma ask for their products when NOT stataly mandated to do otherwise is what it IS proof or corporate greed... I think you got my post exactly the other way around, lol

3º Money...power... yep, at certain level the disctinction can be moot. I have the feeling that past certain point of wealthy, power is what gets the boners...but anyways, that's just a detail.

Yes, the system is quite diffrent in my country and yours... here, parties are financed by public money through quotas, particular donations are minimal...not like you, with your mainly private money sources and PACS and SuperPACS that favour corruption greatly

But again, your main point that you "go to jail if you don't buy the political product" is simply bullshit. You keep repeting that while ignoring my counterexamples.... repetition doesn't give you justification, u know. How in the fuck can you go to jail in USA for not... I don't even understand your sentence... errr... not wanting schools to have free lunches? Lowut?

No, it isn't like that. For starters, you are directly mistaking politics with laws. On a technical level, yes, politicians end making laws, and you need to follow those, to an extent. But that ignores the fact that basically the same laws are approved whatever party is in charge. It's a process mainly independent of the desire of poblation and the politicians themselves. If you are a politician, maybe, and just maybe, if you expend all your political credit in forcing your pet law, you have 1/3 of possibilities of seeing it approved. Once. And then you are probably burned out.

4º Politicians are just puppets compiting for seats. One of the main puppeteers are corps, granted. But there are many others, like public opinion, strange l atractors due to sudden technical advances, Lady Luck, and many other we don't even understand, much less control. The Wire, the tv series, goes about that... there you can see how people at all level of power just basically strugle against "the Gods" trying to stay afloat and nothing more. No time to "sell" anything, except maybe how awesome I am so vote me again, pleeeease

Very little to do with being forced to spend 300$ every day to stay alive cause your goverment hasn't the bollocks to forbid pharmas to be that ruthless.

And you know what? In my country there is insulin available. At 5$. Cause it cost them cents... so there's still profit to make. Why do you refuse to aknowledge that huge point?

Taxes must be paid any way or another, be there one party or another... how is that relevant? How is that a signal that a politician is selling a product, same as a pharma corp? Your analogies seem to be incredibly forced to me, I'm afraid.
I'm going to respond to this later. Looks like I'll need a six pack.
 

Call Me Tim

Dramacrat
1º It's the mechanisms that in a situation of global emergency, allow them to charge people and countries a 2000% marging of profit. Precisely.

Or 300$ for a dose of vital insulin that cost them cents to make. Precisely.
Nope. Not even close.
1st part is corporate agreements with the government. What is being allowed to be charged.
2nd part is insane and not even close to anything remotely real world.
However, none of this explain your made up term "pseudo-monopoly."
You're going to have to give that one another go.
2º Where I did that? I have problems to even get that part.
I claim, if anything, that the grotesque prices pharma ask for their products when NOT stataly mandated to do otherwise is what it IS proof or corporate greed... I think you got my post exactly the other way around, lol
No that was a supporting point. To artifically control prices is literally centrally controlled market. Free market says, you get to the field first you get to charge as much as you think the market will bear. For instance Shrekelli is demonized as a evil dude for charging 2K for an anti AIDS drug. But you had to only take it three times. the other drugs when stretched out over time and dosages cost more. Plus it was really effective. Why not charge more. The more the government screws with the economy the mroe fucked up it becomes. If the gubbermint wasn't involved it would still be fucked up but it woudl be at least understandable.

3º Money...power... yep, at certain level the disctinction can be moot. I have the feeling that past certain point of wealthy, power is what gets the boners...but anyways, that's just a detail.
Money, moot, boners. WUT?

Yes, the system is quite diffrent in my country and yours... here, parties are financed by public money through quotas, particular donations are minimal...not like you, with your mainly private money sources and PACS and SuperPACS that favour corruption greatly
Which side has more superpacs? I'll give you one guess, it's not on the right.

But again, your main point that you "go to jail if you don't buy the political product" is simply bullshit. You keep repeting that while ignoring my counterexamples....
Because your examples or counterpoints don't make sense. Not in the American system. We are arguing two different systems here.
You point to your and say there's less corruption. I doubt it. Centralizing power has always led to corruption.

And yes If i don't buy the 'free school lunch program" touted by the politican that was elected, guess what I go to jail. Pure and simple. I don't have an option to skip taxes.
repetition doesn't give you justification, u know. How in the fuck can you go to jail in USA for not... I don't even understand your sentence... errr... not wanting schools to have free lunches? Lowut?
[/quote
You clearly don't understand American taxes and entitlement programs. Then and let's leave it at that.

No, it isn't like that. For starters, you are directly mistaking politics with laws.
You can't be serious. Politics ends up making laws.
The rest I'm not going to not even retort. Because I think there is something lost in the translation. And it's further compounded by the complexity of the multifaceted subject.
 
Back
Top Bottom