NiggaryanOsaka
Ediot
In simple terms, natural selection is the principle by which the strong survive, and the weak... don't. This principle was most common among humans in the BC era, and projecting natural selection onto the modern world is a rather dubious undertaking, but that's not what I'm talking about.
Many on the far right have a "Great Replacement" theory, according to which the white race is being replaced by immigrants.
But who can be considered the white race? I'll take a banal definition: "those who are ethnically and culturally European." This category could, in principle, include the white population of the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, or even Afrikaners; Slavs could be included in this list. Accordingly, the "black" race can be considered those who are not ethnically and culturally European. That is, Arabs, Africans, Mexicans, and so on.
If we take the idea that "the white race is being replaced" at face value, surprise, surprise - they're not trying to do anything about it. Meanwhile, migrants are perfectly capable of imposing their own rules, and no one - neither the white race nor the government - is going to do anything about it. There are numerous anti-immigrant movements, but they do absolutely nothing except protest and yelp on Twitter. In reality, protests won't accomplish anything - they'll (migrants) just keep stabbing the native British, just as the Indians will continue to stab them.
It turns out the white race is weak.
In natural selection, the fittest survives - in this case, those fittest are migrants, black people. The white race has lost the selection process, so it can't be saved.
In Russia, for example, the Nazis will be stronger than the Nazis in Europe. After all, there have been plenty of high-profile cases of migrant murders. The murder of Shamil Odamanov and the Tajik, the murder of Khursheda Sultonova, and the attack on the school in Gorki-2. These cases are just a drop in the ocean compared to the less high-profile ones. But here's the problem: most of these incidents occurred in the 2000s and early 2010s. Now such cases have become fewer, and banal misanthropy has replaced white supremacy. While the so-called NS/WP specifically attacked migrants, "Sanitaren 88" began attacking homeless people, alcoholics, and drug addicts alike. But it's still not the problem - there are still many migrants, and murders and beatings won't reduce their numbers - for every dead Uzbek, 10 Kyrgyz will replace him. The "whites" are still a minority, and they are still weak. Therefore, the "black race" wins again because it is strong and imposes its own order.
Thus,we somebody can see an inconvenient truth: no matter how hard the "white race" tries to prove its power, in practice they are pretentious and try to compensate for their weakness by beating up migrants. The "black" race, meanwhile, calmly destroys the "white race," and no action is taken. Natural selection wins, just like the "blacks."
Many on the far right have a "Great Replacement" theory, according to which the white race is being replaced by immigrants.
But who can be considered the white race? I'll take a banal definition: "those who are ethnically and culturally European." This category could, in principle, include the white population of the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, or even Afrikaners; Slavs could be included in this list. Accordingly, the "black" race can be considered those who are not ethnically and culturally European. That is, Arabs, Africans, Mexicans, and so on.
If we take the idea that "the white race is being replaced" at face value, surprise, surprise - they're not trying to do anything about it. Meanwhile, migrants are perfectly capable of imposing their own rules, and no one - neither the white race nor the government - is going to do anything about it. There are numerous anti-immigrant movements, but they do absolutely nothing except protest and yelp on Twitter. In reality, protests won't accomplish anything - they'll (migrants) just keep stabbing the native British, just as the Indians will continue to stab them.
It turns out the white race is weak.
In natural selection, the fittest survives - in this case, those fittest are migrants, black people. The white race has lost the selection process, so it can't be saved.
In Russia, for example, the Nazis will be stronger than the Nazis in Europe. After all, there have been plenty of high-profile cases of migrant murders. The murder of Shamil Odamanov and the Tajik, the murder of Khursheda Sultonova, and the attack on the school in Gorki-2. These cases are just a drop in the ocean compared to the less high-profile ones. But here's the problem: most of these incidents occurred in the 2000s and early 2010s. Now such cases have become fewer, and banal misanthropy has replaced white supremacy. While the so-called NS/WP specifically attacked migrants, "Sanitaren 88" began attacking homeless people, alcoholics, and drug addicts alike. But it's still not the problem - there are still many migrants, and murders and beatings won't reduce their numbers - for every dead Uzbek, 10 Kyrgyz will replace him. The "whites" are still a minority, and they are still weak. Therefore, the "black race" wins again because it is strong and imposes its own order.
Thus,
