turns out i AM mensa material

[Baka]

yes

Im glad i got to see it.

 

[dropdatwat]

I am pretty sure extremely similar things have happened multiple times previously and I am pretty sure he gets a massive shot of pleasure every time something like this happens

i fucking don't

 

[.wil]

DDT we're all your friends here

 

[dropdatwat]

also what @.wil did was technically illegal so me banning him was justified

 

[GloriousReader]

Make bens dad a mod

 

[dropdatwat]

View attachment 1074
Make bens dad a mod

FUCKING STOP

 

[dropdatwat]

IT'S BEEN TEN FUCKING HOURS WHY'S IT STILL UP

 

[A Fucking Box]

DROP TELL YOUR DAD HOW TO MAKE AN ACCOUNT

 

[A Fucking Box]

@dropdatwat im sure hell be totally cool ddt just CHILL BRO! Have a beer with the edf gang + your dad

 

[Baka]

>tell people who your dad is
>get mad when someone contacts him

 

[dropdatwat]

>tell people who your dad is
>get mad when someone contacts him

@endsenten found that info WELL before i said anything about him

 

[umkemesik]

ok so let me get this straight

ED page = lawsuit worthy

impersonating someone online with the express intent to defame them = lulzy everyday internet shit

ok then

You are free to do whatever you want. I never said you could not sue anyone associated with this. Or that one is permitted over the other.

I gave you a hypothetical situation if a valid DMCA was ignored and libel/defamation which only applies to people who did the slandering.

That's not what's going on here, or ED for that matter. In neither case have you sent out a DMCA.

The Communications Decency Act immunizes platforms and their owners. Unless I, personally defamed you.

Don't confuse me laughing at the situation with agreeing/disagreeing what is right and wrong.

I can laugh at a guy tripping over his own feet into a ditch, doesn't mean I agree with it.

Also pretty sure Glorious was talking to jM15 and not you.

 

[dropdatwat]

Also pretty sure Glorious was talking to jM15 and not you.

oh

 

[GloriousReader]

I

You are free to do whatever you want. I never said you could not sue anyone associated with this. Or that one is permitted over the other.

I gave you a hypothetical situation if a valid DMCA was ignored and libel/defamation which only applies to people who did the slandering.

That's not what's going on here, or ED for that matter. In neither case have you sent out a DMCA.

The Communications Decency Act immunizes platforms and their owners. Unless I, personally defamed you.

Don't confuse me laughing at the situation with agreeing/disagreeing what is right and wrong.

I can laugh at a guy tripping over his own feet into a ditch, doesn't mean I agree with it.

Also pretty sure Glorious was talking to jM15 and not you.

I was talking to the community as a whole ben included

 

[dropdatwat]

what site takes ten hours to delete a profile with a dick pic at the top

 

[A Fucking Box]

>tell people who your dad is
>get mad when someone contacts him

>implying he didn't want this to happen
ddw knows that his dad is gonna get on edf and it's gonna be awesome, he's just nervous

 

[umkemesik]

also what @.wil did was technically illegal so me banning him was justified

How was it illegal.

 

[dropdatwat]

How was it illegal.

impersonating me with the intent to hurt my reputation

 

[umkemesik]

And I specifically PMd the mods with a TL;DR that you can only ban someone for (1) CP and (2) SPAM.

 

[GloriousReader]

impersonating me with the intent to hurt my reputation

Its a parody bro