both corporate shills and both are rapists
 
The Washington Post has taken fearmongering to a whole new level, projecting that all election scenarios but a Joe Biden landslide will result in violence and chaos in the streets.

Georgetown University professor Rosa Brooks authored the Thursday articletitled, “What’s the worst that could happen? The election will likely spark violence — and a constitutional crisis.”
The “experts” gathered by the Transition Integrity Project (co-founded by Brooks) war-gamed what they determined to be the four most likely scenarios.
They were “a narrow Biden win; a big Biden win, with a decisive lead in both the electoral college and the popular vote; a Trump win with an electoral college lead but a large popular-vote loss, as in 2016; and finally, a period of extended uncertainty as we saw in the 2000 election.”
“A landslide for Joe Biden resulted in a relatively orderly transfer of power. Every other scenario we looked at involved street-level violence and political crisis,” Brooks wrote.
It’s almost like the group was trying to both create a self-fulfilling prophecy and generate fear within the American public of a Trump second term.

The experts who played out the Republican side in the Transition Integrity Project’s war game rank among the most vocal of the NeverTrumpers, including conservative commentator Bill Kristol and former Republican National Committee chair Michael Steele.
On the Democratic side, participants included former Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, former interim Democratic National Committee chair Donna Brazile and former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm.What do all these people have in common? They hate Trump, and they assume the worst about him.
The people engaging in violence right now are left-wingers like Black Lives Matter activists and members of antifa.
The Washington Post painted a hypothetical in which Trump refuses to step down, citing his refusal to say whether he’ll honor the election results.
Instead of holing himself up in the White House as The Post suggested, however, Trump has simply said he may have to challenge the outcome legally.
Remember the 2000 election? Al Gore conceded and then pulled back his concession to George W. Bush and a legal battle ensued.
Hillary Clinton has yet to accept the 2016 election results, consistently casting doubt on Trump’s win. The Obama administration foisted Russiagateon the country.
COMMENTARYWashington Post Promises Catastrophic Violence if Biden Does Not Win








WaPo Promises Violence After 2020 Election - They Shouldn't Get Away with This































By Randy DeSoto
Published September 3, 2020 at 7:15pm
ShareTweetPShareEmail
The Washington Post has taken fearmongering to a whole new level, projecting that all election scenarios but a Joe Biden landslide will result in violence and chaos in the streets.
Georgetown University professor Rosa Brooks authored the Thursday articletitled, “What’s the worst that could happen? The election will likely spark violence — and a constitutional crisis.”
The “experts” gathered by the Transition Integrity Project (co-founded by Brooks) war-gamed what they determined to be the four most likely scenarios.
Advertisement - story continues below

They were “a narrow Biden win; a big Biden win, with a decisive lead in both the electoral college and the popular vote; a Trump win with an electoral college lead but a large popular-vote loss, as in 2016; and finally, a period of extended uncertainty as we saw in the 2000 election.”
“A landslide for Joe Biden resulted in a relatively orderly transfer of power. Every other scenario we looked at involved street-level violence and political crisis,” Brooks wrote.
TRENDING: Police Officer Dies After Being Shot While Attempting To Arrest Assault Suspect
It’s almost like the group was trying to both create a self-fulfilling prophecy and generate fear within the American public of a Trump second term.
The experts who played out the Republican side in the Transition Integrity Project’s war game rank among the most vocal of the NeverTrumpers, including conservative commentator Bill Kristol and former Republican National Committee chair Michael Steele.
Advertisement - story continues below

On the Democratic side, participants included former Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, former interim Democratic National Committee chair Donna Brazile and former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm.
What do all these people have in common? They hate Trump, and they assume the worst about him.
Do you think Trump will win in November?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The people engaging in violence right now are left-wingers like Black Lives Matter activists and members of antifa.
The Washington Post painted a hypothetical in which Trump refuses to step down, citing his refusal to say whether he’ll honor the election results.
Instead of holing himself up in the White House as The Post suggested, however, Trump has simply said he may have to challenge the outcome legally.
Advertisement - story continues below

Remember the 2000 election? Al Gore conceded and then pulled back his concession to George W. Bush and a legal battle ensued.
Hillary Clinton has yet to accept the 2016 election results, consistently casting doubt on Trump’s win. The Obama administration foisted Russiagateon the country.
RELATEbigsad Shock Video Shows Piles of USPS Mail Being Mysteriously Dumped in a Parking Lot
Obviously, I’m not advocating Trump do anything of the sort, but he is wise to keep his powder dry regarding the possibility of challenging the results, especially given the mail-in voting irregularities seen in New Jersey and New York this past spring and summer. Etc. etc. yakyak woof woof
 
He has a list of questions to ask. When it becomes clear the subject is going to refuse to answer, you move on. That footage will be used by the GOP anyway
Nonsense. When the leftist tool accused him of being funneled questions by the Trump admin., Baier just sat there and grinned like an idiot. He didn't bother to set the record straight.

But it's not a big surprise. Baier along with Neil Cavuto and a number of other Fox News personalities have always been NeverTrumpers.
 
Nonsense. When the leftist tool accused him of being funneled questions by the Drumpf admin., Baier just sat there and grinned like an idiot. He didn't bother to set the record straight.

But it's not a big surprise. Baier along with Neil Cavuto and a number of other Fox News personalities have always been NeverTrumpers.
Brett Baier is about as professional as it gets

Take your trump goggles off bro
 
Baier is one of the Bush-holdovers at Fox News. He along with Cavuto, Brit Hume, Shannon Bream, and a few others actually hate Drumpf and their shows reflect that fact.
you mean they are objective reporters who actually do their job? unlike say....Hannity and the people on F&F and The 5 who are literally just there to repeat republican talking points
 
Back
Top Bottom