so is the solution to only have like 12 people that can afford luxuries while everyone else can barely afford food?1. The federal government is not responsible for keeping your belly full. With you, that's obviously an enormous endeavor.
2. Artificially raising the wages is noting more than introducing inflation which in a few years the economy will absorb. And the "minimum wage" is necessary to be raised again. The gubbermint likes this because they can extract more money from the citizens because the gubbermint has effectively divided up your wages into smaller chunks. Also, it has forced the middle class who once was able to be free of government assistance, to consider or request government assistance. More people on assistance = more socialist leaning votes + more taxes which reduces the mobility of the surviving middle class even further. Raising the minimum wage to a "living wage," whatever that amount is, is in actuality reducing the differences in wages for all types of work -- which is the goal of communism.
no way lol. whatever job i work next will have as little human contact as possible.You are still studying to be a nurse are you not?
1. that wouldn't happenWould you be happy with your salary if it were the same as some nurse that was horrible? just started when you had 10 years in? the same as a Wendy McKing's french fry specialist?
2. why should i feel the need to punish people for being less skilled than me?
3. why would i not be more pissed off at money grubbing CEOs, actors, speculators and sportball stars making more FAR more money than me while also being less skilled?
Last edited: