orlyyyy2.jpg

orlyyy.jpg
 
Capture.PNG

Patently false.

Illegals in many cities get a "living stipend" of well over 4000 dollars a month. There have been many stories on how illegals, who have been in the US for about six months having 10's of thousands of dollars in their EBT/rent assistance/quality of living accounts.

To break even on the supposed tax they are paying the government, they would need to be averaging 120K a year, in NY and Chicago, SanFaggot, more like 175K. Hector and Maria are not making 5% money cleaning toilets or roofing.
 
The amount of spin. HOLY SHIT.
General Turdbucket admitted to conspiring to not follow an elected official's orders and informing the enemy.
 
Illegals in many cities get a "living stipend" of well over 4000 dollars a month.
In SOME cities, if they have 4 or more children and can get on restricted lists for Section 8 housing and so forth, they MIGHT come close to this. Try being a single motherfucking raising 4-5 kids alone on even $4k a month. It's been a hot political murderball for decades. Even in the most sappy and degenerate liberal-fixated city San Francisco, single people can get $600 city stipend plus disability or SSI for a grand total of maybe $1400/mo. Enough for drugs, not enough for much else. Not counting a place to live like an SRO hotel room voucher (always massive shortages) which is why thousands of "illegals" are living in tents on sidewalks and shitting on the street. The problem there isn't so much the homeless, it is the feckless local politicians who gobble about "saving the victims of capitalist society" and all that rot, while doling out tiny sums and leaving them to become fentanyl boofers and dead bodies. And skimming off the programs they oversee, which happens more often than anyone realizes.
 
In SOME cities, if they have 4 or more children and can get on restricted lists for Section 8 housing and so forth, they MIGHT come close to this. Try being a single motherfucking raising 4-5 kids alone on even $4k a month. It's been a hot political murderball for decades. Even in the most sappy and degenerate liberal-fixated city San Francisco, single people can get $600 city stipend plus disability or SSI for a grand total of maybe $1400/mo. Enough for drugs, not enough for much else. Not counting a place to live like an SRO hotel room voucher (always massive shortages) which is why thousands of "illegals" are living in tents on sidewalks and shitting on the street. The problem there isn't so much the homeless, it is the feckless local politicians who gobble about "saving the victims of capitalist society" and all that rot, while doling out tiny sums and leaving them to become fentanyl boofers and dead bodies. And skimming off the programs they oversee, which happens more often than anyone realizes.
You're missing the point. They shouldn't expect the US tax payer to pay for all her illegal bastards.

And no. in every city. 4K a month for food alone in my city, they get also food, utilities assistance, public transport stipend, free cell phones and plans, etc., shit they even get a 'quality of life' stipend, because being without cable/internet in America is racist. They often don't have drivers insurance, pay property tax on their vehicles, i see many vehicles just driving around with no license plates., etc.

You have no idea what you are talking about.
 
Trump Administration: trying to end one of the most damaging periods in American history - the unfettered tsunami of millions upon millions of illegal immigrants that were allowed to pour into the country during the Biden administration.

Democrat run states and cities: F U American citizens. We consistently put illegal browns and blacks above you. Therefore, we are trying to “Trump proof” our shitty policies and have set aside $100s of millions of American tax dollars to sue the fed government and try to stop or run out the clock on sensible immigration policies.

Honestly, you really don’t hate democrats, liberals and leftists enough.

 
Joe Rogan’s Trump interview was a ‘traumatic event’ for Kamala Harris

An excerpt from a new book about the 2024 presidential election shed new light on how former Vice President Kamala Harris’ proposed interview with podcast giant Joe Rogan fell apart.

“Trump spent three hours with Rogan in an interview that instantly went viral. The contrast amounted to a ‘traumatic event,’ said one Harris aide, ‘that I will never forget,’” Allen and Parnes wrote.

Following Trump’s election victory, Harris’ team suggested that the president’s interview was the factor that killed negotiations.

“We were hoping to fit it in around that but ultimately weren’t able to do it,” Harris campaign senior advisor Stephanie Cutter said on “Pod Save America.”

Rogan went on to endorse then-candidate Trump on the eve of the election.

The section from “Fight” shed more light on what happened, alleging that initial negotiations held between Harris deputy campaign manager Rob Flaherty and Rogan’s reps were rocky. According to the book, Rogan sent them his list of interview conditions on Oct. 11, which included “no staff in the studio, no topic restrictions, and Harris would have to sign a waiver.”

Additionally, “Harris would have to come to Austin, Texas,” according to the Rogan team, though they signaled there was some slight leeway on this condition.

https://nypost.com/2025/01/30/media...harris-campaign-lost-the-joe-rogan-interview/

YW55wAZ.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom