With too much peace in the world the jews attack Iran

Ytsuken said:
Iran is fucked
Click to expand...
Considering the last three US wars: VietNam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, each lasting 11, 17 and 19 years respectively, while the US has won the major and minor battles, eventually due to political boredom or convenience the US withdrew (lost). All three wars accomplished exactly nothing but strengthened those nations not only militarily but given the people of which resolute resolve -- they have defeated the world superpower. Also given that the two nations bordering on Iran are Iraq and Afghanistan, two nations who would be prime invasion launch points, and now no longer available, it's going to be very difficult to get troops in there.

Missile/air war won't bring "regime change," like Trump is now "hinting" about forecasting. With the Nimitz, one of America's first nuclear aircraft carrier now deployed to that theater, the false flag opportunity now looks like not a possibility but guaranteed.

None of this benefits America, will waste trillions of dollars we don't have and the sole beneficiary would be israel at the cost of the Iranian people as well.

None of this makes sense at all.
 
Ytsuken said:
Vietnam, iraq and afghanistan all got fucked hard during the wars, maybe not as hard as america, but many of their people died for nothing and many had to live with ptsd or missing limbs
Click to expand...
So it seems we are in an agreement or at least on the same avenue of thought.
There is no benefit to the US getting embroiled in another war for the jews.
 
IMG_0180.jpeg

IMG_1093.jpeg
 
Ytsuken said:
@Call Me Tim if you had to bet all your money into whether a nuke will be dropped in 2025, would you bet yes or no?
Click to expand...
That's a tough one. I mean no nation likes to lose. The US is the only nation that has used nuclear weapons so the US "Nuke Virgin" card was already played.
Would Iran do it? I don't think so. Not even on our soil. They are actually far more measured in their actions than the jew media makes them out to be.

Would Russia do it? Again, leaning no. Russian nukes are in bad shape due to the 90's anarchy Russia suffered. Could they though? sure, but Putin is not that crazy. He's not the one launching attacks for the sole purpose of PR and to get US/NATO hardware and money. Zelensky is working a grift it should be obvious. If you look at the Russian progress, and it's pretty methodical, inspite of basically fighting the military production of NATO and the US, the Russians are winning.

China. Slightly no. China wants to be the global dominator. Ruling over a burning ruin is not part of this idea. Plus, any military conquest would directly be for the benefit of China, in either agriculture, they don't really have lots of farmland, industry - kinda shitty, and most of all resources - look what they are doing in Africa. And the underlying real reason for saber rattling at Taiwan is to control the global chip market and then "unify" China. You can't make or reverse engineer chip factories if they are nothing but chunks of melted metal and concrete ruble.

India and Pakistan. That's a coin flip. Both nations are riddled with absolute morons and each has such a blinding hate for each other. So that is possible. But India is in a decades long border skirmish with China and Paki has internal issues with islamic groups. So there are other pressing national concerns. I think they have 1940's tech, and both are using the "tall boy," style of bomb. It's where you shoot a high stream of particles at piece of fissionable material. It's smaller than the implosion type, "Fat Man," and can be be put on a ballistic missile. And plus both armies are both so incompetent their fighting basically come down to autistic slapfights. India has a better record and "beat" the Pakis and the Paki's still don't over escalate. YET.

The US. Nah. There would be no need to. We have enough bombers and attack aircraft to level all of just about any nation's cities within a matter of months. However, the US military is still subject to public opinion and western nations, US (well I hope we still do) has moved away from the whole carpet bombing of cities and want to at least appear to only attack known military targets. Mutual destruction is still policy in spite of what the ilk in US Congress like faggot Senator Linsey Graham says.

NATO. Nope. Similar reasons.

The only real wildcard are the fucking jews. They have the Samson option which literally lays out the destruction of the entire world if israel is about to be destroyed. Talk about ragequit. Plus, while everyone knows who has nukes, no other nation asides israel constantly threatens to "wipe them off the map," while simultaneously denying they have the bomb. But everyone knows they have them. I think they have an estimated 400 of them. HOWEVER, israel likes to use the US and NATO as a deterrent to them to having to use them. Like in "Braveheart," where King Richard says "use up the Irish," it's "use up the goyim." So they are the most likely ones that would be enthusiastic in modifying the weather to 15 million degrees in certain cities. BUT, the conflict with Iran and israel and the US and Russia is no where near the critical point where the jews could or should use the bomb. Things are not that dire yet. The entire israeli government is full of vile terrorists like Ben Gvir who are just murderous scum which follow the "teachings" of evil rabbi who have laid out a policy of basically "kill all goyim." So I'm betting it will be the jews that start nuking.

For that to happen, a lot of moving parts all have to fall and click into place in a pretty specific order to do so.
1. The US limits or stops interference. Which it looks like we're not going to do. Trump "hinting" at regime change pretty much makes that a guarantee.
2. The jews have to really start to lose massive amounts of IDF soldiers. Officially they've lost about 2K dead and serious (not returnable to combat) wounded. They would have to lose something like two divisions, 10K dead and perhaps 40K seriously wounded. That would be about half of their active fighting force and a total loss of one quarter of combat strength.
3. Other muslim nations finally get jew fatigue. They stop trading, embargos, maybe start arming insurgent groups, etc., and really start dialing up the pressure on the jews.

For all these things to happen within six months is unlikely in my opinion. They could happen but it's really not probable. Looks like Trump is bought lock, stock and barrel and he's not going to "abandon our greatest ally." There is real opposition to Netandyahoo. He's actually as concerned of being thrown out of office by the jews for his mismanagement of the government and gross government overreach even by jewish standards. He's totally fucked over the court system and jews are upset. Will the other muslim nations finally rise up against the jews? Dunno. The only one that expressed any real desire aside Yemen is Turkey. But for now Turkey is saber rattling, and waiting for the muslims to congregate, there is still not much official open agreement on the issue.
No. BUT, by say June of next year? Yeah that is possible. Is it probable? A solid possible maybe? And the reason is that the jews have really cut off any outside media coverage and are actively targeting citizen reporters to control any information about israel so there is no real way of gauging the effects of any attack or counter attack. it's a real shot in the dark.

But if anyone would use a nuke, I'm certain that it will be the jews.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom