not quite what i'm getting atlike, if you have
i didn't strawman anything, you left everything open to interpretation. that's on you for being too lazy to be specific. also, @minty is here, and anarchism she describes isn't a way of governance, it's a way of life, 19th century USA frontier life before the government expanded and imposed itself
self-sufficient natives and pioneers
semantics, n smth anarchists n tankies fought abt online for years. "A COUNCIL IS A FORM OF A SOVIET"is even a bigger bait, and i am surprised smarter people than me didn't call you out on it. anarchy IS the absence of a government body. it's in the name. anything else anyone can say on the matter is just mental gymnastics. what minty said? bells and whistles. it doesn't matter if decisions are made by direct democracy or trial by combat or how daily life and economy are structured. no government = anarchy.
i don't understand where the fuck this one is going, it's literally a translationA COUNCIL IS A FORM OF A SOVIET
yes but anarchist council is "totally different" n needed to be looked down on by tankies that beat their dicks raw over "young_stalin.jpg"... i never understood.i don't understand where the fuck this one is going, it's literally a translation
"a council is a form of a council"
??
and no, this is more than semantics
it's a matter of false advertising
"check out this beautiful honda anarchy"
*pops hood, looks inside*
-5 cillinder democracy engine
-no telepathic consensus
i thought i was the only one who found the thirst over young stalin to be kinda cringe.yes but anarchist council is "totally different" n needed to be looked down on by tankies that beat their dicks raw over "young_stalin.jpg"... i never understood.
personally always saw the definition of communism "a classless, stateless society" and found it indistinguishable from anarchism (cuz it kinda is) n never understood the retarded nitpicking n infighting. the disagreements between the two groups are all simply about how to get to the same end goal.
this is why i once argued with baya ages ago abt how you can have socialism with anarchism (since it's worker ownership of means of production n doesn't inherently require a state) n how it's not contradictory.
at this point tho i generally don't give a shit what it's called, if it's worker co-op or communalism or collectivism or council-based or syndicalism or rainbow unicornism or blah blah blah... just swallow your pride n fucking build your alternate system already instead of slapfighting n backstabbing each online over terminology n show other ppl there's working alternatives possible n that you're willing to put in the work to make it real. an appalachian lumpenprole is infinitely more grateful about my mutual aid donations that help pay grandma's heating bills in winter than they are about being told they deserve it because they voted wrong
it is... i dunno. he's not ugly he just sorta looks like a normal person?i thought i was the only one who found the thirst over young stalin to be kinda cringe.
homie this thread was as disappointing as the communism thread that got derailed by jackasses talking abt "commiefornia" n gavin newsomReading this with one eye but I think minty is rightno further explanation
that we know ofHumans have been around for 300,000 years and yet we didn't have law until the last 3,800 during the Bronze Age.
writing things down actually weakens your memory because you're not forced to carry it in your head anymoreif ya don't write it down and protect it, things never happened