@Likeicare
Here is the situation. I vote for the more conservative candidate. Generally, it's someone on the R side. In this case, if I were able to, I would vote for the democrat, since an anti-cop, societal norm, and wholly unqualified medical experiment is on the R side, and wait until for the next cycle for a decent R candidate.
Most of the time, these little races are won unopposed, or the incumbent is so ingrained into the system it's highly unlikely ANYONE would oust them. Take for example my county. A man named Huckelberry has been the county manager for decades. He has made numerous questionable decisions, including spending 5 million dollars for a bowling alley -- because "historic site," (the snowbirds want to keep the "old Tucson charm" and hate anything modern, it's as if the retired boomers want to relive their childhood in the fifties; he promptly gave himself a 100K raise when he said he wasn't; and pressed for more taxes to cover it, however all country workers didn't see a raise even though a raise was promised to them, (they have been getting fucked over for decades), the roads are in a shambles, and no one really investigates or knows where the money goes for the roads; etc.
If the medical experiment in question was running against Huckelberry I wouldn't vote for either. Huckelberry typically wins in a landslide no matter the pre-vote polling. He's probably one of the most powerful men in the state.