‘Transsexual Satanist anarchist’ whose slogan is ‘f*** the police’ wins GOP nomination for New Hampshire county sheriff

tim, how is it that some young roo knows more about american politics than you?

i really should get a proof-reader... that sounded better in my head...
What? Because people voted party lines during a primary in a tiny race?
There's no guarantee that they will repeat the same mistake. Again. Joke vote.


Proving the point
Saying that voting party lines is something that only happens on the R side is laughable is what I'm saying.
Have you not paid attention to the previous and the current US general elections?

I'm not even in the same galaxy as funny.
GroyperSupreme said:
I'm willing to guess a lot of anitfaggots and BLMers voted for this guy
GroyperSupreme said:
Do try to not get butthurt about bullshit.

You know there are people who intentionally try to throw elections by fucking with the candidates, right?
Have you forgotten how the DNC fucked Kommisar Sanders right in the ass? And "covertly" threw their "support" behind Trump thinking he would be the easiest to beat?

Primaries are typically low turn out. Tranny got the top spot with less than a 200 vote margin. You're really making a mountain out of a molehill, but that's typical for you.

Anyhoo. It was just supposed to be a funny story. You are really turning into a wet blanket.
 
@Likeicare
Here is the situation. I vote for the more conservative candidate. Generally, it's someone on the R side. In this case, if I were able to, I would vote for the democrat, since an anti-cop, societal norm, and wholly unqualified medical experiment is on the R side, and wait until for the next cycle for a decent R candidate.

Most of the time, these little races are won unopposed, or the incumbent is so ingrained into the system it's highly unlikely ANYONE would oust them. Take for example my county. A man named Huckelberry has been the county manager for decades. He has made numerous questionable decisions, including spending 5 million dollars for a bowling alley -- because "historic site," (the snowbirds want to keep the "old Tucson charm" and hate anything modern, it's as if the retired boomers want to relive their childhood in the fifties; he promptly gave himself a 100K raise when he said he wasn't; and pressed for more taxes to cover it, however all country workers didn't see a raise even though a raise was promised to them, (they have been getting fucked over for decades), the roads are in a shambles, and no one really investigates or knows where the money goes for the roads; etc.

If the medical experiment in question was running against Huckelberry I wouldn't vote for either. Huckelberry typically wins in a landslide no matter the pre-vote polling. He's probably one of the most powerful men in the state.
 
and I think they spent 1M renovating it only to have the bowling alley close down after two years because no one was using it.
 
@Likeicare
Here is the situation. I vote for the more conservative candidate. Generally, it's someone on the R side. In this case, if I were able to, I would vote for the democrat, since an anti-cop, societal norm, and wholly unqualified medical experiment is on the R side, and wait until for the next cycle for a decent R candidate.

Most of the time, these little races are won unopposed, or the incumbent is so ingrained into the system it's highly unlikely ANYONE would oust them. Take for example my county. A man named Huckelberry has been the county manager for decades. He has made numerous questionable decisions, including spending 5 million dollars for a bowling alley -- because "historic site," (the snowbirds want to keep the "old Tucson charm" and hate anything modern, it's as if the retired boomers want to relive their childhood in the fifties; he promptly gave himself a 100K raise when he said he wasn't; and pressed for more taxes to cover it, however all country workers didn't see a raise even though a raise was promised to them, (they have been getting fucked over for decades), the roads are in a shambles, and no one really investigates or knows where the money goes for the roads; etc.

If the medical experiment in question was running against Huckelberry I wouldn't vote for either. Huckelberry typically wins in a landslide no matter the pre-vote polling. He's probably one of the most powerful men in the state.
Why are you making this about you

I was talking about average republicans. I already know you're at least somewhat more intelligent than the average republican because you talk in more than single sentences at a time
 
As a proud member of the trans community, I find the attitudes expressed within this thread funny extremely arousing offensive.

I shall expect reparations to be sent forthwith.
 
Why are you making this about you

I was talking about average republicans. I already know you're at least somewhat more intelligent than the average republican because you talk in more than single sentences at a time
Just want to make clear on where I stand.

I'm not going to defend the spitbubble blowers on my side of the aisle, and boy howdy do we have some doozies. However, there are at least just as many or perhaps more on the liberal side, since the liberal side caters to the "everyone is a victim" ideology.
 
As a proud member of the trans community, I find the attitudes expressed within this thread funny extremely arousing offensive.

I shall expect reparations to be sent forthwith.
What will be your preferred method of payment? Underaged boys or underaged girls? Because Epstein is kinda dead right now.
 
Back
Top Bottom