Holy fuck I thought I was on /v/ for a moment.
Null vows to delete 9chan and Kiwi Farms by tonight if this section 230 thing doesn't improve
- Thread starter DankMemer
- Start date
Pre NEOgaf #Metoo /v/ at that
Pretty much everyone /v/ complained about on Gaf is on Resetera now
Hope this place doesn't die. We're the very best of the bottom of the barrel, when it comes to users.
Resetera is gaf
Man it sucks that Trump wants to kill free speech
Meanwhile antidote BBS stays unscathed. lol at trump stealing your iphone
Null posted an essay on Kiwi Farms. Although he said it isn't a shutdown notice, it sounds like a canary in the coal mine thing.
I didn't know what the fuck a kiwi farm was until two weeks ago.
Today I educated myself on their drama. People driving to null's house, calling in bomb threats in his name, and having his Mother fired / licensed.
Pretty sick shit. I wonder why he didn't give up a longtime ago.
I didn't know what the fuck a kiwi farm was until two weeks ago.
Today I educated myself on their drama. People driving to null's house, calling in bomb threats in his name, and having his Mother fired / licensed.
Pretty sick shit. I wonder why he didn't give up a longtime ago.
Thing is, sites like Kiwifarms, ED, and even a place as hands off as this one are only gonna be able to last so long, at least in their current state, that writing has been on the wall for years now. At the very least, with the way silicon valley works, banned from social media and scrubbed from search engines like they did in Germany
Hopefully there will always be a site to call home. Even if one is hut down.
Null also said that Kiwi Farms got too big. What once was a small community of close knit people now had tens of thousands registered users. That causes problems.
I'm wondering how they'd actually be able to make laws that would go for sites like ED or Kiwifarms.
Like, Kiwifarms hasn't ruined anyone's lives in any way that mainstream news outlets haven't. Any kind of legislation like that could almost immediately backfire on every news outlet ever.
No, because of this simple tenant:
"Liberals always exzempt themselves from the rules they place on others"
As you see with BLM, which is blatantly racist and hypocritical liberals do not care.
As long as a board owner or social media site doesn't edit legal content, they should be okay. The social media sites claim to be unbiased and are simply platforms for hosting content - that's how they qualify for the 230 exemption. When they edit content they become publishers.
The new executive order requires companies to affirm they have no bias. That will be interesting to see.
Yes, because it will instantly be obvious when they violate that order. Right now, Jack Dorkey's panties are in a bunch.
Lol because its all he has
Cant believe people think kiwi farms is going anywhere
Josh is addicted to onlyfans and kiwi farms pays for it
Well it seems every week he's dropping these hints he really doesn't want it anymore. I noticed on his profile new comments are pronouncing it dead.
Maybe he hopes somebody makes him an offer.
Hotwheels got money for his shithole, right?
Hotwheels got money for his shithole, right?
Hes been doing that for years, he'll get drunk and write a sad emotional post, sleep, wake up and get drunk again but this time make a very defiant post and get lots of back pats and praises