do you class the NSA as a private company?
A quick guide to OPSEC
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
Call Me Tim
Dramacrat
No. But that data doesn't fall under the protections of needing a warrant. Because that legal point was won on the basis that it was freely available or not a 100% controlled transmission.
Again this has nothing to do with the gubbermint figuring out that your password is "niggers1" and browsing through your deviant art MLP collection.
Call Me Tim
Dramacrat
No Warrant, No Problem: How the Government Can Get Your Digital Data
ProPublica is an independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest.
www.propublica.org
Call Me Tim
Dramacrat
What part of BoR is specifically for the gubbermint and not private companies do you not get?
The fact that it is still listed on the BoR still grants me far more protection from the government than a government that doesn't have a similar document -- like say -- Australia.
The fact that it is still listed on the BoR still grants me far more protection from the government than a government that doesn't have a similar document -- like say -- Australia.
WHELL ACKSHWALLY THE GUVMENT DOESNT COLLECT CITIZENS DATA THEY JUST GIVE THE MEANS TO DO SO TO PRIVATE COMPANIES THEN PAY THEM TO HAND IT OVER
MERIKA FUCK YEAH #CONSTITUTION
Its a federal crime for a government to collect an australian citizens data without a warrant
Call Me Tim
Dramacrat
The gubbermint subpoenas the information. Which means there has to be some sort of connection to a crime. And this still has nothing to do with the anemic OPSEC security list which the gubbermint routinely shatters.
Call Me Tim
Dramacrat
And people don't break laws?
Call Me Tim
Dramacrat
does this apply to private companies like say fB?
Yes. Facebook etc have been in the Aus federal courts for years arguing about if accepting their T&C is still them violating our laws
Dude the CIA bug phones from the factory. This has all been exposed
Also the data they have on Aus vs US citizens is already completely different to begin with
Sleepy
Ediot
yes even though the media, payment processors, big tech, universities and major corporations are enforcing a political agenda and are actively ruining the lives of people who go against it at least orange man can't stop SNL from calling him a big meanie free speech is truly alive and well
Call Me Tim
Dramacrat
Is it still in litigation?
News to me. But not surprising. China has been bugging computer chips for years also.
I'm not seeing the point.
The original discussion was the US gubbermint will bipass any attempts at personal e-security because it can., and somehow morphed into you pissing on Merica.
Kind of a moot topic eh?
The funniest part of conservatives is they spend all day complaining about gov and corporations stripping them of their rights while simultaneously aggressively defending their ability to do so
Call Me Tim
Dramacrat
I already addressed that. No elected official on either side cares because bigtech brings in so much money. On that subject, Merican citizens for the most part couldn't give a naked leap at a rolling donut.
Having no e-privacy has been a thing now for what 20 years in Merica? Why is this so surprising?
Yes tech companies violate their federal status frequently and have been openly doing so for a decade. Is it wrong? according to the provision yes. will anything be done? No.
Don't see the issue. It's the new norm. Adapt or go extinct.
Lets ask all the people who get away with cybercrime and don't get caught.
You can't seem to grasp the difference between a government threat model and a corporate one and how the two are distinctly interlinked. It's clear your understanding of cybersecurity boils down to articles you've read on foxnews.
You're the one who brought up that you've "helped put several people in federal prison." I didn't say anything about law and order, I'm just saying it would be unwise for any fringe online community to put someone unwilling to disclose their role in federal dealings in any kind of position.
What on the list have you actually used?
What's your current setup?
You adapt by utilizing open source privacy tools, using strong encryption, and not acting like a retard.
Call Me Tim
Dramacrat
Again you act like I can actually do legally do something other than vote for someone who tells me they will work to ensure my rights are not violated. I'm not sure what you expect, perhaps a brick though a federal courthouse window? I don't see how that will change anything.
In the west it's not as prevalent as you think. Those white hat hackers? Yeah often turned and former black hats.
Most real cybercrime is committed by nation state sponsored team. ie China, NK, etc. I won't include the nigerian scams because that really is just simple fraud, nothing computer-y about it.
And you can't grasp the simple fact that your feeble list of e-protections are nothing more than a speed bump to the federal gubbermint. About your private tech happily in bed with the gubbermint -- LOL this shit's been going on long before you started jacking it to deviant art. The fact that you are suddenly surprised or believe that these measures are any real defense in one's online presence is lunacy.
You know you can scroll up and look at previous pages. Or did they not teach you that in haxker class?
It's my right to not disclose what I done which may or may not have helped an investigation. I don't see the problem here other than your irrational hate for me. I'm against crime. I would hope you are too. However, your autistic screeching about OPSEC software measures, and your complete cowardice in disclosing what state you're in suggests you are deeply involved in something nefarious.
I should disclose this information -- why?
And I have proved those measures have been near useless when the government is determined to get your information or access your data.
Aside of the not being a retard. However, not being a retard/criminal will avoid 99.99% of those issues.