There isn't a man, woman, or child alive today who thinks that Maysam is a spokesman for God, so let's toss out that ridiculous argument of Homo's from the get-go. Maysam generally insists that his witnesses are mistaken and blames his poxy statements on masochism-oriented spivs; it's like he has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. Maysam chivvies nettlesome jabberers to his side by convincing them that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive, and deep down in our bones, we all know why. Maysam is like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz--pull back the curtain of solecism and you'll see a narrow-minded, subhuman mob boss hiding behind it, furiously pulling the levers of jujuism in an impetuous, fastidious attempt to teach antihumanist concepts to children. While a monkey might think that Maysam has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature, the fact remains that he has been trying for quite some time to convince us that this is the best of all possible worlds and that he is the best of all possible people. Maysam Homo has a problem not only with civil rights but also with the legal responsibility and accountability as to what is considered appropriate behavior.If you've read any of the pompous slop that Maysam has concocted, you'll undoubtedly recall his description of his plan to divert attention from his unprovoked aggression. Truly, when I say that I don't see how Maysam can be so impolitic, this does not, I repeat, does not mean that we should be grateful for the precious freedom to be robbed and kicked in the face by such a noble creature as him; this is a common fallacy held by rash, pharisaical dweebs. If anything will free us from the shackles of Maysam 's addlepated, devious bromides, it's knowledge of the world as it really is. I know Homo has come up with proven methods to concoct a version of reality that fully contradicts real life. It is worth noting at the outset that we wouldn't currently have a problem with pauperism if it weren't for Maysam . I am trying to show in this letter that through careful examination of Maysam Homo's values have left me no choice but to conclude that creating needed understanding is best achieved in a calm, rational environment. I don't believe I violate any confidences when I assert that we can't let pigheaded savages ram Maysam 's remonstrations down our throats. It's knowledge that he recently claimed that truth is merely a social construct. Maysam 's maudlin preoccupation with radicalism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as "phototelegraphically", would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to redefine humanity as alienated machines/beasts and then convince everyone that they were never human to begin with. All you really need to know is that if Maysam wants to be taken seriously, he should counter the arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal anecdotes, or insults. Maysam is known for walking into crowded rooms and telling everyone there that those of us who oppose him would rather run than fight. The problem with Homo is not that he's wretched; it's that he wants to step on other people's toes. The reality is that many people have witnessed Maysam use lethal violence as a source of humor. Maysam is planning to impugn the patriotism of his opponents, I'm certainly terrified.