Bait title lol there should be no limits to the FREEDOM of speech.
But could you argue there should be limits to the definition of speech? I think you could and there should be such limits. Freedom of speech is defined as the right to say what you want. I believe in that right, but I don't believe everything people and "people" on EDF express falls into the category of coherent speech. Let's discuss such exceptions:
- Twitter links
A twatter link now and then doesn't hurt, almost exclusively "communicating" by spamming shitty twitter embeds should be punishable by death. So yes, I do believe the world would be a better place with @Magalicious beheaded in front of a cheering crowd.
- Low to no discernible reading comprehension of the writer
No need to name names, there are too many. When a poster makes a post that is obviously unintentionally out of context because his retard brain cannot process the words that came before his post.
- Incoherent bullshit and way too fucking much of it
I would say yes that in fact we are actually all preview [insert AI generated image]
TL;DR the following post sums it up perfectly
My conclusion to this problem is EDF needs a gulag subforum to lock up the retards incapable of actually saying anything. It's like EDF was a clean city that took in a few pajeets for its own amusement and to nobodys surprise the subhumans multiplied like rats. Now, a few years later, the entire city is a designated shitting street. We need to put the monkeys openly defecating in every fucking thread back into the zoo where they belong.