I like to make shit up because I'm a stupid trannie. Ok.
Some pagan religions
-- pagan religions automatically accept anything that is detremental to Christianity since Christianity is seen as an "oppressor." Next.
modern western culture
-- Which is why in every vote gay marriage was rejected by vote and only a court ruling made it acceptable. Next.
some periods in chinese history
-- Which were generally short periods of social unrest and had no lasting impact on the culture. And still is overwhelmingly rejected. Next.
It has historically been accepted in southeast asia
-- Rephrase question. Same answer. No. Homosexuality has never been accepted in Asianic culture. It's known, but not accepted. It is disgraceful to one's family. Next.
It has historically been accepted in Japan
-- How many times are you going to rephrase the same point. Still wrong. Next.
Ancient greece and rome
-- Sexual servitude was a component of both cultures and a show of political and social dominance. While the popular modern culture sees these anchient empires as homocentric, they were not. Modern misinterpretation misconstrues kindship with homosexual relationships. Also many of the writers which have lasted history were gay and have given gayness an unrealistic weight.
Ancient Assyeria
-- Again no. See above. And Assyria
Ancient Macedonia
-- Which is Greece. Again see above.
Some African cultures
-- No African culture openly supports gayness. Gayness is illegal in the entire continent of Africa and has been for millennia. You're just making shit up now. Next.
Many native american cultures
-- No. LOL Again you're making shit up or over emphasizing a few instances. Again. The rate of homosexuality in society is and has been relatively the same, 3 - 5%.
most buddhists accept homosexuality
-- Again accepting that homosexuality exists doesn't mean they accept the practice. Next.
It was accepted by the celts
-- Don't know much about the Celts but doubtful since there is little or no history of their day to day culture.
It is accepted by the natives of papua new guinea
-- again accepting that something exists doesn't mean accepting of the practice. Next.
Hindus have accepted it occassionally. They arent very clear on it.
-- again since some accept it as existing doesn't' mean the whole do.
Aside of you literally making points which unravel at the slightest tug of the thread, I would say, LOL.
www.usatoday.com
